It's terrible news.
I haver the same reaction to when I heard the news that Guinness was laying off all its coopers in the 1950s. It's crazy, they should have kept them on, even if they were not needed.
And the invention of the printing press was really no excuse in the 1400s for the monasteries to get rid of their scribes.
We should not allow technology to change the world. We should not allow the banks that we bailed out and part own to close branches just for the sake of being efficient and profitable.
Let's ban all electronic money so that people are forced back to using cash and cheques.
Brenda
The lack of empathy and borderline viciousness on both this thread and on some of the Ulster threads is both surprising and frankly somewhat disappointing. It also contrasts with people complaining on other threads about the lack of human contact when it comes to dealing with issues with their digital "bank" (and I'm using inverted comma's here deliberately as some of these apps are not banks).
I've no argument that banking is changing, that the use of cash and cheques is in decline and the need for most people to actually visit a bank branch is reducing, especially if you can still do your banking via An Post. What BoI are doing reflects that to a certain degree. However the move to digital banking might be great in 5 years time if the National Broadband plan delivers but these closure decisions are going to cause problems in the short to medium terms for a lot of people.
It's clear banks no longer want to sell us products, get to know their customers and find solutions and services to meet their needs. Instead they are assuming you will come to them digitally if you want something. That is a short term reaction that will come back to hurt both the bank and their customers in the years to come. I wonder in 10 years time will there be a "computerised lending" scandal because the IT brigade thought they knew best? What happens to BoI if they get a repeat if the Ulster IT issues of a few years ago?