Complainer
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,949
Other countries (such as Finland if I'm not mistaken) use electronic voting systems. I don't recall that there is an issue with those systems per se. The electronic voting system that was used in Ireland was heavily criticised during its design phase by the Irish Computing Society. They said that there was no proper design specification issued for the equipment in the first case. In addition, they called for a paper-based auditing system (which wasn't included?). I can't find the link for this at the moment but this was back in 2004. It is possible to have electronic voting - but the original decision and specification was rushed through.
The system bought for Ireland was indeed a pile of poo. I'm not sure how the systems work in other countries, but certainly the absence of a voter verifiable audit trail is a fatal flaw. The conflicting requirements of anonymity and traceability cannot be satisfied without a paper trail.
Of course, we don't know the cause of the errors. If we knew what had caused them, they wouldn't be errors.Thanks for that link - very interesting. I actually e-voted in Meath in 2002.
How do we know that the errors are due to the machines though rather than errors by the presiding officers?
Manual recounts often change the vote tallies but people seem to accept that human errors can occur.
There are often small variations in recounts, due to manual errors. In the cases where the extent of these errors are significant, whatever time and resources are required are provided to ensure an accurate count.
Electronic counting of votes is the easy part. The difficult bit is to ensure and guarantee in a verifiable way that the vote entered by the voter is what is recorded on the system.