Hello,
The FSO has ruled in favour of the bank re a mortgage complaint. Given the historic amounts involved and future amounts expected Ill now need to appeal to the high court.
Its quite a terrifying prospect and extremely costly.
While obviously Ill need to obtain advice from my solicitor I would really appreciate any advice / guidance. The FSO's ruling was flawed and incorrect. Im 100% satisfied that I am correct however still terrified that the high court may not read the situation correctly.
Just wondering ...
My argument to the FSO was slightly incorrect although the result would have been the same.
Will this have a bearing on the high court hearing?
Can new evidence be submitted to the high court or does the high court solely review the correspondence?
Is it a case of me Vs the FSO or is it me Vs the financial institution? Or both?
Is there any correspondence between parties prior to the appeal (via solicitors)
Therefore in review of correspondence is there any chance that FSO may see the error of their logic and reverse their decision or attempt to settle or instead even a new oral hearing?
Or is there no correspondence between parties whatsoever until review at the high court hearing?
Final question - what do you think chances are of making a new complaint to the bank however coming from a different angle and packaging it as a new complaint? Would there be any chance whatsoever of making it to the FSO?
Thank You all for your input. I realise a lot of these questions should be directed at a solicitor however thought it might help others here on the board also.
The FSO has ruled in favour of the bank re a mortgage complaint. Given the historic amounts involved and future amounts expected Ill now need to appeal to the high court.
Its quite a terrifying prospect and extremely costly.
While obviously Ill need to obtain advice from my solicitor I would really appreciate any advice / guidance. The FSO's ruling was flawed and incorrect. Im 100% satisfied that I am correct however still terrified that the high court may not read the situation correctly.
Just wondering ...
My argument to the FSO was slightly incorrect although the result would have been the same.
Will this have a bearing on the high court hearing?
Can new evidence be submitted to the high court or does the high court solely review the correspondence?
Is it a case of me Vs the FSO or is it me Vs the financial institution? Or both?
Is there any correspondence between parties prior to the appeal (via solicitors)
Therefore in review of correspondence is there any chance that FSO may see the error of their logic and reverse their decision or attempt to settle or instead even a new oral hearing?
Or is there no correspondence between parties whatsoever until review at the high court hearing?
Final question - what do you think chances are of making a new complaint to the bank however coming from a different angle and packaging it as a new complaint? Would there be any chance whatsoever of making it to the FSO?
Thank You all for your input. I realise a lot of these questions should be directed at a solicitor however thought it might help others here on the board also.
Last edited: