They were serious breaches of corporate governance in a membership organisation which receives state funding.
So what happens for serious breaches of corporate governance, I assume little or nothing. At least it doesn't matter as this organisation is very small and cannot harm anybody.
Who is responsible for ensuring corporate governance, and do they ever do anything.
Interesting point at the beginning about the auditors not knowing or realising or informing about when AGM's had to be held, not until Burgess raised a pertinent question. Who are those auditors? Of course maybe the guys running CAI misunderstood the date and it wasn't the auditors fault. You would think that auditors, being professionals and board members, being paid and being board members would know the basics.