It's a disgrace that someone on a TD's package can get legal aid. Full stop.But if the court decides he is entitled to free legal aid based on their criteria who the heck are you or i to pass judgement and say he shouldnt be getting it? Also he isnt a solictor so you cant suggest that just because he isnt a dope or destitute then he shouldnt be getting the free legal aid.
Let me put it to you like this and i look forward to your reply on this: why do you think "its a disgrace" that he Is getting free legal aid, assuming that he is entitled to it?
Is there some sort of 'Universal legal aid' in place that we weren't aware of...perhaps based on the Dutch model