Hi,
I wish to apply for an annulment .The grounds are that I was forced into marrying a non national against my better judgement so she could get residence ie I was told that she would not live with me unless I did .Then 6 months into the marriage she lost interest and then did not have sex with me.I was upset with this and developed gay relationships. These are 2 grounds for an annulment.
The problem is this is difficult to prove to a court,gay relationships are still discreet and no one will say this in court.What happens in the family home between 2 people cannot be demonstrated also.
There are no statistics on the details and outcome of recent cases that I can find.
Any help appreciated.
Atkin.
Off topic maybe but lack of interest in sex is not grounds for annulment, however it would seem that one of the parties being homosexual is, so technically maybe she could file for an annulment as you engage in homosexual sex???
Hi,
I wish to apply for an annulment .The grounds are that I was forced into marrying a non national against my better judgement so she could get residence ie I was told that she would not live with me unless I did
I was told that she would not live with me unless I did[marry her]
Civil annulments are relatively easy to get if both parties are complicit. All they need do is say they did not consummate the marriage, very hard to disprove.
Civil annulments are relatively easy to get if both parties are complicit. All they need do is say they did not consummate the marriage, very hard to disprove.
Who are they hurting? No-one.
The grounds are that I was forced into marrying a non national against my better judgement so she could get residence. I was told that she would not live with me unless I did.
Very well said.I disagree. Legal procedures are based on fact, and fact is ascertained through people telling the truth. If it becomes part of the culture that it is acceptable to tell lies on the argument that no harm is being done, then it can quickly follow that people may tell lies to achieve the "right" result.
Suppose I am a witness in a case, and I "know" that the defendant did assault the victim, but did not actually see it. I might claim to have seen it in order to get him convicted, as he deserves to be.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?