You have no idea what the incident looked like from a person viewing it from outside. As I said previously, you broke a red light (which i think you accept, albeit reluctantly), it is possible that the car with the right of way had to brake, you have no way of proving they didn't. A guard sees you edging out on a red light and a car behind brake lights. What are they supposed to think?. Did other cars behind the first one also have to brake to prevent a fender bender as well. ? Again, you have no idea? If there was brake lights seen, then it indicates that the traffic was moving, albeit slowly, as opposed to someone being nice and letting you out into the traffic before moving on themselves.Peanuts, I brake all the time on a regular basis while in urban traffic, it's a simple reaction to other driver behaviour, there is a difference between that and jamming the breaks to avert crashing into someone,the latter absolutely did not happen yesterda
You'll have to add those to the backlog of questions already posed and not yet answered in an attempt to clarify what exactly happened here.An interesting question would be to ask where was the Garda car when this happened, what was their view of the issue? An other interesting question to ask would be what was the position of your car on the road when the other lights turned green
Agree with what though? It's still not even clear what is claimed to have happened and descriptions to date are patchy, inconsistent and contradictory in place in spite of attempts by the prigs to clarify what happened.If the judge is familiar with the junction, they could agree with you.
in spite of attempts by the prigs to clarify what happened.
Almost certain, 3 point offences default to 5 points on conviction.Main concern is were the judge to side with the guard's view ?,how likely would they be to increase the number of penalty points?