A perspective on mortgage arrears and negative equity

MORAL HAZARD SMORAL HAZARD: Why the Moral Hazard Argument is Dumb!

Isn’t it funny how the Bankers, Civil Servants, Accountants, Auditors, Politicians who caused the current financial crisis are the ones arguing against the necessary steps to stop the bleeding?

Moral hazard, while real sometimes and in some places, is vastly overrated as an effect.
Granted, it’s seductive in the same way that risk homeostasis is — the notion that, for example, people drive faster and take more risks because they have seatbelts — but like risk homeostasis, moral hazard is vastly over-diagnosed.

People don’t project five years into the future and say, “Leverage up, boys and girls. We’ll either make a lot of money now, or be bailed out later.”

Real people in real situations don’t think that way. Matter of fact, if anything, they’re short-sighted in that regard to a fault.

http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj29n1/cj29n1-12.pdf See below for an extract.


My question who failed who!
 

The IT also said in its piece the day after that he was getting 188 per week and that he had a wife and 2 children.

He was surely entitled to increase in welfare payment for his dependants.

He apparently chose to make full mortgage repayments as a matter of pride or something but I can't see how a person could let their children go so hungry they're eating cardboard rather than fill in the dependants section of the social welfare application.

The story really doesn't sound true, or at least not the whole truth.
 
Further detail from the IT on what the letter writer should be entitled to - which he has either omitted to mention or, for some reason, didn't apply for: As well as the €188 per week plus €280 per month childrens' allowance which he said was the sole income, he would also be entitled to €125 per week spouse/partner benefit plus €30 per week for each dependent child - so an extra €185 on top of his €188 per week. The IT also calculated his mortgage interest supplement at c. €400 per month if applicable. Plus back to school allowances, medical card etc.
 

And yet the IT editorial still had a go at blaming the Government! This new editor needs to get his act together.