To clarify, he didn't like my use of the phrase "Bearded Brethren" to describe Union leaders. I told him that I would stop using it but I forgot and used it again. That was the last straw, as it were.Interesting.
How do you know if you're on someone's ignore list btw?
There was a time when I might have agreed.
However, over Christmas I spent 5 hours in A & E with a relative before he was eventually seen by a doctor.
The relative had an infected cyst which needed to be drained. We first went to the local pharmacy, which told him to go to his GP.
The GP would not touch it; neither would the doctor in the VHI Swiftcare clinic. So we had nowhere else to go except A & E, even though we tried everything to avoid it.
My relative was mortified, sitting among relatives and friends of people who had suffered strokes, heart attacks, really serious injuries, etc., and when eventually seen, apologized profusely to the doctor for presenting in A & E with such a comparatively trivial complaint. The doctor was excellent and very kind, a complete gentleman. The procedure took about 40 minutes.
In reply to our questions, the doctor said that this could have been handled by either the GP or the VHI Swiftcare clinic, but it depended on the competence and experience of the doctor. He also said that the length of the procedure might deter some GPs as they could see several patients during that period.
Also, the triage nurse, whom we saw first, seemed to be sick and tired of patients being foisted on A & E, in particular by VHI Swiftcare clinics, with complaints they should be able to handle themselves and in addition charging patients €75 for the privilege of doing nothing other than writing a letter of referral.
Ah! shucks Purple, I don't think Déise Blue has anything (personally) against you. You are entitled to your views, but you keep harping away at the unions on every post that will accept your print. Would it not be better for you (or anybody else) to set up a thread and call it "The Case Against Trades Unions" and the argument can then be hammered out separately and squarely?To clarify, he didn't like my use of the phrase "Bearded Brethren" to describe Union leaders. I told him that I would stop using it but I forgot and used it again. That was the last straw, as it were.
I think it fair to say that we use this kind of media mainly for some fun (although some posters get a bit heated occasionally, me included). I do not speak for Déise, but I agree with much of what he says. Furthermore, I have a love for Waterford having lived there years ago.Thanks Leper, nice to see grown ups who can stand adult debate.
I suppose the reason I don't confine my distain for Unions to one thread is the same as other posters don't confine their distain for the government to one thread; they are part of so much of the problem.
Lepers can be proud, you know.
Agreed. The GP's might actually be doing their job properly and treating people rather than referring them to A&E.Isn't it a little strange that hospitals whose A&E departments weren't overcrowded when all this hit the headlines have been eerily quiet since? Suddenly all those must visit A&E cases have gone to their doctors, or taken a paracetamol.
Good question!It seems that the tail is wagging the dog in the health service yet again. An A&E consultant on the news the other night was asking the nurses to allow an extra bed be added to wards to alleviate pressure in A&E and then the Minister said the same thing the next day. Why are Nurses dictating this, why aren't management insisting on it?
It seems that the tail is wagging the dog in the health service yet again. An A&E consultant on the news the other night was asking the nurses to allow an extra bed be added to wards to alleviate pressure in A&E and then the Minister said the same thing the next day. Why are Nurses dictating this, why aren't management insisting on it?
In other words they have to ask the nurses...I think you may be wrong , current union/ management agreements mean that under extreme circumstances an additional bed is permitted , however what Management are currently seeking is an unprecedented 2nd extra bed which causes huge pressures on staff - such is the pressure that staff in Beaumont are currently voting on a work to rule policy .
I think you may be wrong , current union/ management agreements mean that under extreme circumstances an additional bed is permitted , however what Management are currently seeking is an unprecedented 2nd extra bed which causes huge pressures on staff - such is the pressure that staff in Beaumont are currently voting on a work to rule policy .
And yes Leo has to request the INMO for permission to install a 2nd additional bed as the mutually agreed management/union terms does not allow for a unilaterally enforced change to such terms.