K
KalEl
Guest
Sadly it really is a friend. I bought an Avensis earlier in the year (Great car, don't slag it!).
Has he considered a CLK 200 or is his heart set on a BMW?
Sadly it really is a friend. I bought an Avensis earlier in the year (Great car, don't slag it!).
Has he considered a CLK 200 or is his heart set on a BMW?
Heart set on a Beemer. CLK 200 is a smashing car but he won't be shoved near a Merc dealership! He just perfers the BMW.
Avensis is also a non runner
then he should buy a Volvo if he thinks the Saloon is nicer than the Coupe.But he perfers the saloon.
Having been reading this thread, I can't help but think that those commenting on the 520D SE being underpowered haven't actually driven one.
I was actually lucky enough to be in a position to buy one this in January and I can confirm the performance is excellent for a car of this size and price range.
0-60 in 8.6 secs (auto) is 0.5 sec better than the €5k dearer 523i and the 50-70 time is better than the 523i & 525i and just a shade short of the 530i. For Irish road conditions, it has all the power you would ever need.
Of the cars in this class and size it is easily the best deal available (this is all relative, I know), particularly with the high level of spec you get with the 5 series BMW these days.
I still look forward to driving it every day
Having been reading this thread, I can't help but think that those commenting on the 520D SE being underpowered haven't actually driven one.
I was actually lucky enough to be in a position to buy one this in January and I can confirm the performance is excellent for a car of this size and price range.
0-60 in 8.6 secs (auto) is 0.5 sec better than the €5k dearer 523i and the 50-70 time is better than the 523i & 525i and just a shade short of the 530i. For Irish road conditions, it has all the power you would ever need.
Of the cars in this class and size it is easily the best deal available (this is all relative, I know), particularly with the high level of spec you get with the 5 series BMW these days.
I still look forward to driving it every day
Yes - my budget allowed me to get leather and automatic transmission. Delighted with both.
However, I found it hard to justify adding much else for 2 reasons - the fact the spec is very high anyway and the amount BMW look for on a lot of the other fairly frivolous extras.
Hope this helps your friend in coming to his decison.
Having been reading this thread, I can't help but think that those commenting on the 520D SE being underpowered haven't actually driven one.
Ive been told the auto would use more then the manual but from my own experience my 520 petrol is roughly the same as my last car which was a 1.6 laguna. I get 420-430 miles out of a tank nearly every time and had got the same out of the laguna, averages around 28-30mpg or whatever that is in km so unless lagunas are bad as well I dont find the 520 heavy on juice. my 2 centimes.All though next car I would like to go bigger but even the 2l eats ( auto ) petrol and I dont think woth the amunt of city driving I do I could warrant the extra running costs for the extra kick on the w/e!!
Ive been told the auto would use more then the manual but from my own experience my 520 petrol is roughly the same as my last car which was a 1.6 laguna. I get 420-430 miles out of a tank nearly every time and had got the same out of the laguna, averages around 28-30mpg or whatever that is in km so unless lagunas are bad as well I dont find the 520 heavy on juice. my 2 centimes.
Would anyone know the litre capacity of the tanks so that comparison is like for like?
The 530d vs 520d has caught my eye....can anyone let us know what the performance difference is with regard to mid range punch?
Basically talking acceleration from say 40-60mph & 50-70mph, overtaking speed mainly. 0-60 seems a bit irrelevant for day to day driving.
The above would be my deciding factor in choosing one or the other
Hard to quantify, but there is a big difference.