Catholics aren't the only people who believe in those things. Just because you don't want to be Catholic doesn't mean you automatically have no faith.
Give respect, get respect.
that's the gaa coming out in you. :d
(for ye non-believers in the one true faith (i.e. The gaa), "give respect, get respect" is an initiative to get people to stop abusing the ref ..... Abusing the ref being one of the unofficial tenents/traditions of the gaa that most of us indulge in, to one extent or other)
In fairness to Bronte, it was Birroc who made the original zombie comment - which I agree is unnecessarily offensive.
Nobody is asking you have respect for those individuals but you should have some respect for people who believe in God and might take offence at having him referred to as a 2000 year Zombie. Respect and tolerance for other peoples beliefs is not a one way thing.
That's my experience as well. I don't believe in God but I have no major problem with RC teaching on the ground; most priests I know are good open-minded people who spend their time doing good and helping people. I detest and despise the hierarchy of the RC Church and in particular the man who runs it.In my experience (2 children, same school) that does not happen. When my children made their fHC, no-one was excluded. Children of a different faith and of no faith were all included. Most, if not all, were kitted out in usual outfits, and parents, and were fully involved on the day. When the time came for each child to receive the sacrament, those who were not there to do so, received a blessing from the priest.
You get that kind of bullying nonsense from kids of that age about Premiership teams, choice of music, brand of runners, etc. It betrays the values of the parents involved, not faith.
And, FWIW, when at Mass, I'm a 'front-rower'. Not because I'm a zealot, but to keep an eye on my altar server son and hiss prompts to him when his attention wanders .
I like that. I fully intend to use it!After all, parents allow there kids dress up at Halloween and they don't believe in ghosts. Same principle.
I like that. I fully intend to use it!
Can someone explain to me why comparing religious belief to believing in ghosts does not seem to be seen as offensive, but comparing a man who rose from the dead to a zombie is
Because one is a general comment and the other is a specific reference.
Seriously? You wonder why it might be offensive to a Catholic to refer to their god as a zombie? Saying anything derogatory about someone’s god is bound to be offensive but answering your specific question, the belief is that This post will be deleted if not edited immediately returned from the dead fully functioning – not as an animated corpse capable of movement but no conscious thought and most likely controlled by some nefarious power for evil doings (know any ‘good zombie’ stories?).Why is it offensive?
. This is atrocious grammar, even for schoolkid, and demonstrates poor knowledge of pronouns. You should have words with the English teacher."My mammy says that children that don't do communion hate God".
Thanks for your comments folks. Apologies for the zombie comment, I was being silly and I dont want to challenge other people's beliefs. Live and let live.
I am not anti-RCC on this issue and I have no problems with the School who were very understanding and accepting. I just want people to appreciate that some children will take part in Catholic rituals and some wont. It shouldn't be a complete unheard of surprise which seems to apply to most people over 40. I don't want my child feeling like some kind of outcast missing out on something wonderful.
but you could always plan something for that day and let them have that to look forward to instead.
but you could always plan something for that day and let them have that to look forward to instead.
Seriously? You wonder why it might be offensive to a Catholic to refer to their god as a zombie? Saying anything derogatory about someone’s god is bound to be offensive but answering your specific question, the belief is that This post will be deleted if not edited immediately returned from the dead fully functioning – not as an animated corpse capable of movement but no conscious thought and most likely controlled by some nefarious power for evil doings (know any ‘good zombie’ stories?).
What I do find offensive is non evidential matters of opinion on supernatural beings being taught alongside maths and language as matters of fact to children who are too young to have developed the critical thinking necessary to distinguish what is real from what is not.
"Sorry kids. You're only allowed to believe in things that are evidentially true"