From: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15908
VIDEO: Swine Flu Government Data Scam
Government using fraud to generate flu hysteria
Global Research, November 3, 2009
CBS - 2009-11-02
Employees are being told they have to receive the Swine Flu vaccine or lose their jobs.
Schools are giving children the vaccine against their parents wishes.
Now it has been revealed in this CBS report that the federal government is withholding data that shows a large percentage of people who have been reported as having the Swine Flu did not in fact have it. http://www.brasschecktv.com/
=====================================
Something I've been saying for months now and finally someone in CBS pulls the plug on this nonsense.
Yes, there is apparently some sort of swing flu virus and yes some people have got it and yes, for some people whose systems are already fighting another illness, there may be a risk of death.
But, out of all the numbers tested, it turns out that the actual cases of H1N1 are in low single figure percentages, and the subset of these where death actually arises is even lower - on the basis of these facts, there seems to be no case for mass-vaccinations
This is because, even in the face of an actual widespread outbreak, the methods used in treating an "epidemic" are necessarily broad spectrum because given the manufacturing time to market/supply, you just cannot target a mutating virus accurately.
In other words, by the time you target a specific "bullet" for one variant of the virus, its moved on, mutated and become slightly different. So you need - by definition - a generic solution, one that will work for whole families of that virus.
That's known as a broad spectrum "solution", a contradiction in terms if ever there was one.
Because if you're not killing 100% of the virus, all you're actually doing is breeding drug-resistant strains of that virus. This is a well known principle. This means you're storing up problems for the future for far greater numbers of people than might be killed by the initial outbreak - a super-virus.
This isn't fiction on my part BTW, its already been reported
[broken link removed]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8124987.stm
And look at the terms in which an alleged Swine Flu death is reported in that last link:
"It is understood from her doctors at Birmingham Children's Hospital that she had underlying health conditions. It is not yet known whether swine flu contributed to her death."
What does that mean - did she or did she die from Swine Flu?
I'm not trying to show disrespect for the death of a child -far from it - but I have serious concerns about the way in which this tragedy was high-jacked to create more Fear Uncertainty and Doubt [F.U.D. from the 1960's] about this so-called epidemic.
And then there's this piece of nonsense about an untested cocktail of drugs; -
Now just think about this for a minute.
You're supposed to get a better result when treating Tamiflu-resistant visuses not by substituting drugs that work, but by including Tamiflu in an untested cocktail of drugs.
This piece of wonderment is brought to you by the same people whose cocktail of drugs administered to American Troops in Gulf War 1 destroyed their health and produced Gulf War Syndrome; -
http://www.immed.org/illness/gulfwar_illness_research.html
I'd like to take this opportunity to ask readers of this forum to think seriously about the level of collusion required to promote mass vaccinations using broad spectrum medical techniques on the basis of hyped evidence through the office of our very own HSE.
Don't allow yourself to become distracted by the failure of the Financial Regulator and the nonsense of NAMA or you'll miss this nonsense. Be very careful of what you allow into your child's bloodstream or your own.
FWIW
ONQ.
VIDEO: Swine Flu Government Data Scam
Government using fraud to generate flu hysteria
Global Research, November 3, 2009
CBS - 2009-11-02
Employees are being told they have to receive the Swine Flu vaccine or lose their jobs.
Schools are giving children the vaccine against their parents wishes.
Now it has been revealed in this CBS report that the federal government is withholding data that shows a large percentage of people who have been reported as having the Swine Flu did not in fact have it. http://www.brasschecktv.com/
=====================================
Something I've been saying for months now and finally someone in CBS pulls the plug on this nonsense.
Yes, there is apparently some sort of swing flu virus and yes some people have got it and yes, for some people whose systems are already fighting another illness, there may be a risk of death.
But, out of all the numbers tested, it turns out that the actual cases of H1N1 are in low single figure percentages, and the subset of these where death actually arises is even lower - on the basis of these facts, there seems to be no case for mass-vaccinations
This is because, even in the face of an actual widespread outbreak, the methods used in treating an "epidemic" are necessarily broad spectrum because given the manufacturing time to market/supply, you just cannot target a mutating virus accurately.
In other words, by the time you target a specific "bullet" for one variant of the virus, its moved on, mutated and become slightly different. So you need - by definition - a generic solution, one that will work for whole families of that virus.
That's known as a broad spectrum "solution", a contradiction in terms if ever there was one.
Because if you're not killing 100% of the virus, all you're actually doing is breeding drug-resistant strains of that virus. This is a well known principle. This means you're storing up problems for the future for far greater numbers of people than might be killed by the initial outbreak - a super-virus.
This isn't fiction on my part BTW, its already been reported
[broken link removed]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8124987.stm
And look at the terms in which an alleged Swine Flu death is reported in that last link:
"It is understood from her doctors at Birmingham Children's Hospital that she had underlying health conditions. It is not yet known whether swine flu contributed to her death."
What does that mean - did she or did she die from Swine Flu?
I'm not trying to show disrespect for the death of a child -far from it - but I have serious concerns about the way in which this tragedy was high-jacked to create more Fear Uncertainty and Doubt [F.U.D. from the 1960's] about this so-called epidemic.
And then there's this piece of nonsense about an untested cocktail of drugs; -
Now just think about this for a minute.
You're supposed to get a better result when treating Tamiflu-resistant visuses not by substituting drugs that work, but by including Tamiflu in an untested cocktail of drugs.
This piece of wonderment is brought to you by the same people whose cocktail of drugs administered to American Troops in Gulf War 1 destroyed their health and produced Gulf War Syndrome; -
http://www.immed.org/illness/gulfwar_illness_research.html
I'd like to take this opportunity to ask readers of this forum to think seriously about the level of collusion required to promote mass vaccinations using broad spectrum medical techniques on the basis of hyped evidence through the office of our very own HSE.
Don't allow yourself to become distracted by the failure of the Financial Regulator and the nonsense of NAMA or you'll miss this nonsense. Be very careful of what you allow into your child's bloodstream or your own.
FWIW
ONQ.
