It's very light on facts.
Here's a quote; The EMA says AstraZeneca hasn’t submitted its application yet; it doesn’t seem to occur to anyone to pick up the phone and ask. EU institutions still see their role as blocking what could be dangerous innovations. No one has stopped to wonder if sometimes — such as in a pandemic, for example — it might be better to encourage technology. But that’s bureaucracy: it sticks to the script long after it stops making sense.
The authors have made a series of assumptions and accusations which they have made absolutely no effort to back up. It's the sort of thing that would cause bemused head shaking if overheard from some verbose drunkard in a pub.
There is no attempt to deal with facts or accurate timelines, just swipes at politicians and staff based on their nationality. I'm not a regular reader of the Spectator and if that's the standard of what passes for journalism I'm comfortable with missing their, em, "insights".