osullivant
Registered User
- Messages
- 12
Please tell me if I appear from the following, to correctly understand the nature of an assent:
My understanding is that; an assent is just a sort of confirmation that the executors themselves, have no objection to the property being registered in the name of the beneficiary.
If I have a correct understanding of the above, please tell me if the following is a correct statement of the law:.
"In the case of registered land it is not necessary to have possession of the title documents, in order to grant a valid assent. "
If I appear from the foregoing, to have a correct understanding of things, is it true to say that
" if a third party questioned the rights of the deceased to the property, It would not be necessary ( in the strictest sense of the word) for the executors to have that question resolved prior to granting an assent"
Apologies for the lack of clarity in the previous version (s).
My understanding is that; an assent is just a sort of confirmation that the executors themselves, have no objection to the property being registered in the name of the beneficiary.
If I have a correct understanding of the above, please tell me if the following is a correct statement of the law:.
"In the case of registered land it is not necessary to have possession of the title documents, in order to grant a valid assent. "
If I appear from the foregoing, to have a correct understanding of things, is it true to say that
" if a third party questioned the rights of the deceased to the property, It would not be necessary ( in the strictest sense of the word) for the executors to have that question resolved prior to granting an assent"
Apologies for the lack of clarity in the previous version (s).
Last edited: