This is the scenario:
Company X - with director Mr A and Mr B contracted to build a house. Monies paid, job not completed. Clients then discover that Company A has done this to other clients, trail of unpaid contractors and suppliers etc...
Company X is liquidated by Revenue Commissioners. In the meantime, Mr A and Mr B hook up with Mr C and start another company - Company Y - same story ensues... unhappy clients, unpaid contractors and suppliers..
Company Y is put into liquidation by the Revenue - High Court case. Some idle late night googling uncovers the surprising (not!) fact that Mr C has now started up another company with another party...
Who allows this?? Would the Director of Corporate Enforcement be the body charged with seeing that this does not happen?
Company X - with director Mr A and Mr B contracted to build a house. Monies paid, job not completed. Clients then discover that Company A has done this to other clients, trail of unpaid contractors and suppliers etc...
Company X is liquidated by Revenue Commissioners. In the meantime, Mr A and Mr B hook up with Mr C and start another company - Company Y - same story ensues... unhappy clients, unpaid contractors and suppliers..
Company Y is put into liquidation by the Revenue - High Court case. Some idle late night googling uncovers the surprising (not!) fact that Mr C has now started up another company with another party...
Who allows this?? Would the Director of Corporate Enforcement be the body charged with seeing that this does not happen?