LouisCribben
Registered User
- Messages
- 337
The following article explains why Mr Comiskey was suspended as a solicitor
http://www.independent.ie/national-...d-following-probe-into-mortgages-1859841.html
Could someone please explain exactly what he did wrong and how he benefitted from the fraud (if it was a fraud)
What I don't understand specifically is the line
"
Yesterday the Law Society claimed that Mr Comiskey had been giving the sale proceeds of properties to the vendors, and leaving the buyer with an undischarged mortgage on the title."
What does this mean ? How did Mr Comiskey benefit, did he end up profiting from the transaction, I assume so, but how ?
How does it affect the buyers, will they be out of pocket ?
http://www.independent.ie/national-...d-following-probe-into-mortgages-1859841.html
Could someone please explain exactly what he did wrong and how he benefitted from the fraud (if it was a fraud)
What I don't understand specifically is the line
"
Yesterday the Law Society claimed that Mr Comiskey had been giving the sale proceeds of properties to the vendors, and leaving the buyer with an undischarged mortgage on the title."
What does this mean ? How did Mr Comiskey benefit, did he end up profiting from the transaction, I assume so, but how ?
How does it affect the buyers, will they be out of pocket ?