Offered a Civil Service EO job; but not sure whether to accept?

Other comparable public sector organsiations (e.g. Euro Commission, UK civil service) recruit directly to positions rather than having the Irish system of panels.
THis is an over-simplification. The UK civil service still has [broken link removed]. It does indeed recruit into [broken link removed]directly, as does .

My experiences with many private businesses is that the higher you go, the more generic your skills are. Senior managers are senior managers, whether they came from IT, finance or marketing backgrounds. They will frequently switch roles & responsibilities to develop their own skills. It's not that different really.
 
THis is an over-simplification. The UK civil service still has [broken link removed]. It does indeed recruit into [broken link removed]directly, as does ..

With respect, I think THIS represents an over simplification. The UK's recourse to recruitment of specialist skills is far more frequent and wide ranging. For example, HR is treated as a specialist skill wheras in the Irish equivalent, it's just one of the positions into which you might be assigned if you happen to occupy the grade at which the vacancy arises.

Similarly, in the UK, if you operate in, say, HR at a partcular level, it's possible to highlight other HR posts or promotional opportunities across the UK civil service as a whole and to plot a career path that doesn't require you to move away from your core competency. The same HR profesional in the Irsh sysrtem might well be promoted but it would be rare for them to move to a position that built on their direct HR expertise or experience.


My experiences with many private businesses is that the higher you go, the more generic your skills are. Senior managers are senior managers, whether they came from IT, finance or marketing backgrounds. They will frequently switch roles & responsibilities to develop their own skills. It's not that different really.

I would agree that the skills required for senior management are more generic. My point, however, related to more junior positions (e.g. EO/AO and other middle management positions) around which the thread was originally devised.
 
Salary - must start at point 1 on scale

If you can prove that your current salary is higher, you can start on the 4th point of the scale which would be 5-6k higher thus bringing the salary close to your current job. This is not advertised - you have to ask for it and back it up with P60s to prove. You can also use previous work experience for same i.e. if you can prove that you did a job of similar skill for up to 4 years, you may also start on the 4th point. The decision will be up to the Personnel Officer in whatever Dept you are appointed to, but in most cases they give in if they think that the applicant will refuse the job for salary reasons. Best approach is to ring them and say you want to take the job, but the salary is a lot lower than current and you cannot accept it at the rate offered.
 
If you can prove that your current salary is higher, you can start on the 4th point of the scale which would be 5-6k higher thus bringing the salary close to your current job. This is not advertised - you have to ask for it and back it up with P60s to prove. You can also use previous work experience for same i.e. if you can prove that you did a job of similar skill for up to 4 years, you may also start on the 4th point. The decision will be up to the Personnel Officer in whatever Dept you are appointed to, but in most cases they give in if they think that the applicant will refuse the job for salary reasons. Best approach is to ring them and say you want to take the job, but the salary is a lot lower than current and you cannot accept it at the rate offered.

Are you sure that your information on this is current, and applies to new joiners to the public/civil service? I understood that Dept Finance had very strict guidelines about starting on the lowest point in the scale, except in cases where this had been agreed prior to the starting of the recruitment.
With respect, I think THIS represents an over simplification. The UK's recourse to recruitment of specialist skills is far more frequent and wide ranging. For example, HR is treated as a specialist skill wheras in the Irish equivalent, it's just one of the positions into which you might be assigned if you happen to occupy the grade at which the vacancy arises.

Similarly, in the UK, if you operate in, say, HR at a partcular level, it's possible to highlight other HR posts or promotional opportunities across the UK civil service as a whole and to plot a career path that doesn't require you to move away from your core competency. The same HR profesional in the Irsh sysrtem might well be promoted but it would be rare for them to move to a position that built on their direct HR expertise or experience.
Far away hills are greener. The UK central website currently has [broken link removed] available, including one junior admin position and one fixed-term contract, so I don't expect that UK-based HR staff will be doing huge amounts of career planning looking for promotions here.

For comparative purposes, the includes specialist positions for diplomats, HSE clerical officers, ICT staff, ICT staff specifically for Dept of Agriculture, HEO Employment Assistance Officer (a HR role!), accountants for Dept Justice, and auditors, and this ignores truly specialist roles like Gardai, Firefighters and EMTs.

I don't think it is fair to diss the Irish service and sign the praises of the UK service.
 
Are you sure that your information on this is current, and applies to new joiners to the public/civil service? I understood that Dept Finance had very strict guidelines about starting on the lowest point in the scale, except in cases where this had been agreed prior to the starting of the recruitment.

If you go to the civil service personnel website - [broken link removed]

And look at the "starting pay" section, you'll see reference to a document called "28/04/1994 LP Conf. Confidential - starting salary at open competitions " dating from 1994. So the rules havent changed in recent years.
 
For comparative purposes, the includes specialist positions for diplomats, HSE clerical officers, ICT staff, ICT staff specifically for Dept of Agriculture, HEO Employment Assistance Officer (a HR role!), accountants for Dept Justice, and auditors, and this ignores truly specialist roles like Gardai, Firefighters and EMTs.

I don't think it is fair to diss the Irish service and sign the praises of the UK service.


Without second guessing your public sector experience, I suspect it's not based on the CS in particular.The list you offer includes various positions in the wider public sector (HSE, Gardai,etc). I was referring to the civil service in particular which was the original subject of the thread.

That the Irish CS recruits directly to some positions is not not evidence that the practice is as widescale as it perhaps should be. Whether there's a value making the process more widespread in clearly a matter of opinion but I certainly think it's worthy of consideration. I've done some research around this to support a thesis a couple of years ago and I believe that benefits would accrue to managers, jobholders and, ultimately, the general public. I know of many disaffected managers and jobholders who are frustrated by an absence of any policy which seeks to match people to jobs that match their skills. As I mentioned previously, the system requires the success of coincidence.

For example, prior to moving to IFSRA, responsiblity for the regulation of bank charges lay with the Director of Consumer Affairs whose office was staffed with general grade civil servants with no particular background or expertise in financial services. Had any of these people applied for a job in the Central Bank they would have been utterly rejected. The people who were asked to talke on this job were under considerable stress to perform a job they didn't ask for and weren't equipped to understake. An ability to recruit directly to these positions (which is what IFSRA eventually did on assuming the function) would have circumvented this problem to mutual benefit. I doubt this example is isoated.

It is disingenuous to suggest that I'm dissing the Irish system and singing the praises of another. i'm merely pointing to what I regard as some deficiencies and pointing to examples of where some attempts to address the issue have been taken.
 
If you go to the civil service personnel website - [broken link removed]

And look at the "starting pay" section, you'll see reference to a document called "28/04/1994 LP Conf. Confidential - starting salary at open competitions " dating from 1994. So the rules havent changed in recent years.

Thanks - very useful. Pity that the content of that circular is deemed confidential. You don't know where I'd happen to find a copy, by any chance?

Without second guessing your public sector experience, I suspect it's not based on the CS in particular.The list you offer includes various positions in the wider public sector (HSE, Gardai,etc). I was referring to the civil service in particular which was the original subject of the thread.
Indeed, my direct personal experience is directly related to the broader public service, rather than the CS. Though like most public servants, I do of course engage with the CS and Public Appointments Service from time to time.

That the Irish CS recruits directly to some positions is not not evidence that the practice is as widescale as it perhaps should be. Whether there's a value making the process more widespread in clearly a matter of opinion but I certainly think it's worthy of consideration. I've done some research around this to support a thesis a couple of years ago and I believe that benefits would accrue to managers, jobholders and, ultimately, the general public. I know of many disaffected managers and jobholders who are frustrated by an absence of any policy which seeks to match people to jobs that match their skills. As I mentioned previously, the system requires the success of coincidence.
Not much that I'd disagree with there. Did your research look at what happens when specific posts dissappear through a change in government or change in policy?
 
Try an FOI request.
You can't get it that way, its exempt under section 21(1)(c)



21.
—(1) A head may refuse to grant a request under section 7 ifaccess to the record concerned could, in the opinion of the head,
reasonably be expected to—
(



a) prejudice the effectiveness of tests, examinations, investigations,

inquiries or audits conducted by or on behalf of
the public body concerned or the procedures or methods
employed for the conduct thereof,
(b) have a significant, adverse effect on the performance by the
body of any of its functions relating to management
(including industrial relations and management of its
staff), or
(c) disclose positions taken, or to be taken, or plans, procedures,
criteria or instructions used or followed, or to be used or
followed, for the purpose of any negotiations carried on
or being, or to be, carried on by or on behalf of the
Government or a public body.


 
I am assuming this 'secret' memo outlines the guidelines which apply to starting pay so don't think any of the above would apply. However, I would need to see the memo first (ha ha).
 
Did your research look at what happens when specific posts dissappear through a change in government or change in policy?

To be honest, no. This didn't present itself as an issue but I'd be genuinely interested to know how likely an occurance this is. The only example I can think of is the redeployment of customs officers after the EU became a single market. AFAIK they were offered administrative positions throughout the civil service. Doubtless this would have required a more imaginative solution in my perfect world but that's not to say the issue couldn't have been overcome.
 
If you go to the civil service personnel website - [broken link removed]

And look at the "starting pay" section, you'll see reference to a document called "28/04/1994 LP Conf. Confidential - starting salary at open competitions " dating from 1994. So the rules havent changed in recent years.

the fact that it's confidential would be an indicator that the starting salary is negotiable as per comments by myself and others here. the people i know for certain that started on point 4 got this a number of years ago, about 5 years if i remember correctly.
 
To be honest, no. This didn't present itself as an issue but I'd be genuinely interested to know how likely an occurance this is. The only example I can think of is the redeployment of customs officers after the EU became a single market. AFAIK they were offered administrative positions throughout the civil service. Doubtless this would have required a more imaginative solution in my perfect world but that's not to say the issue couldn't have been overcome.

I was thinking more about individual posts, rather than large-scale groups like customs officer. For example, two specific senior posts (PO level) currently advertised on publicjobs.ie (one CS, one PS) arise from specific provisions in the Disability Act 2005. It is not unforseeable that a future Govt decision could change the approach/process/structure eliminating the need for these positions. It will be very difficult to make these positions attractive to experienced individuals, if the positions are likely to be eliminated at the whim of a Minister. In fact, one of these positions is a 5-year fixed term contract, which will make it unattractive to anyone looking for a career. I would bet that it will be mostly those approaching retirement age who will apply for this position.
 
Interesting reading here how often it is stated as FACT that EO's MUST start on the first/lowest point of the scale. This is not true. And believe me, the 4th point on the scale is not the best that one can hope for either. Not by a long way!!
 
Promotion is competence based - if you can demonstrate the ability you will get the job.


Its not quite as simple as that. Interviews are competency based but there are a lot of people chasing very few places so even if you demonstrate the competency you may not get high enough marks to be placed on a panel. Also, the competency based interview has become somewhat formulaic and some people who are t who are useless on the job can crack the formula and do brilliantly. Some Departments have copped on to this and are starting to introduce 'semi-competency' based interviews to try and get a more accurate view of candidates.
 
Back
Top