I've made a successful Appeal and have been awarded additional monies - which have been accepted without prejudice.
I've had Counsel Opinion from a 'High Profile SC' on my case who says I will undoubtedly win in the High Court that the Bank caused the loss of the home, which the Bank deny. I'm advised to issue proceedings.
A ex Bank Manager friend had strongly advised not going to the Irish Ombudsman and to go to the High Court. However, this week, he called to say that given the recent change in Ombudsman, cases brought and awards made are far more customer friendly - he advised to go to the Ombudsman.
Is there a general consensus that the 'new' Ombudsman is a better bet?
I've had Counsel Opinion from a 'High Profile SC' on my case who says I will undoubtedly win in the High Court that the Bank caused the loss of the home, which the Bank deny. I'm advised to issue proceedings.
A ex Bank Manager friend had strongly advised not going to the Irish Ombudsman and to go to the High Court. However, this week, he called to say that given the recent change in Ombudsman, cases brought and awards made are far more customer friendly - he advised to go to the Ombudsman.
Is there a general consensus that the 'new' Ombudsman is a better bet?