LUAS - Is that it?

D

daltonr

Guest
I've noticed the Luas on the streets a Dublin a few times recently. I'm a little worried.

It's tiny. Originally I couldn't understand why they didn't just build QBC's along the proposed routes, and a few more routes besides, and throw a hundred new busses at it. Surely that would have gotten as much volume as Luas, and it would have been cheaper and more flexible (Busses can be diverted, can drive around accidents, holes, roadworks etc).

I assumed there was a really good reason, but given the cost of building Luas, and the disruption, and now the relatively small size of the vehicle. I'm worried that there wasn't a good reason all along.

So, speak up if you know.
Why didn't they just use QBC's and LOADS of busses. This isn't the wisdom of hindsight people were asking this before Luas started.

Any ideas?

-Rd
 
Is this any use? Not sure how many carriages each tram will use...

[broken link removed]

Looks like in the future everybody will drive the EU standardised motorised vehicle and each tram will carry an equal number of men and women!
 
235 People
Click to expand...

This must include London Tube like stuffing of people. Judging by the size of the Trams I saw.

Anyone know what a double decker will take?

Tallaght Square to Middle Abbey Street: 38 minutes
Click to expand...

I'll try driving this next weekend at 2 or 3 in the morning to see how long it would take on a QBC. Roughly.

For accuracy, I'll speed past all the bus stops like the real busses do. ;)

More later.

-Rd
 
A double decker takes 98 people (13) standing if my memory from Saturday night is working properly.

Nogser
 
Rd

You are correct

The Luas is indeed a big mistake

For what has been spent strengthening the streets to take the massive weight of the trams thousands of busses could have been purchased and QBCs / new bus only roads put in and still had most of the Luas budget left over.

Of course busses are more flexible as to how they can be routed ( handy if the next pope visits Knock etc etc ) and can adapt to changes due to real world events ( road works, crashes etc )

I believe the present tram idea dates back to before large diesel engines were made to operate as clean as they do ( & getting cleaner by all accounts )

Luas is expensive, inefficient and very disruptive

( Your standing room allocation on board is 21 inches X 21 inches )


eDog
 
> ( Your standing room allocation on board is 21 inches X 21 inches )

Not 21" x 21" x 21" I hope! :eek

;)
 
daltonr,

You normally residing in Waterford an' all and despite your trips around the mad roundabouts in the Sqr. it obviously hasn't sunk in that there ain't no QBCs from Tallaght to Abbey St!

The buses constantly have to pull in/out into the traffic and this delays them. People regularly spend 1.5/2 hours gettin' from town to Tallaght especially when the lads hold a function in the Castle and block Dame St.
 
The LUAS has been a huge waste of time and more importantly money (did we go over the billion mark yet?).

However, now that we have it it will serve a purpose and will I'm sure be useful.

As for the bus argument, yes...they would have helped alright.
However, what Dublin desperately needs is an underground system. Unfortunately we don't have politicians with the foresight to see this.
 
You normally residing in Waterford an' all
Click to expand...

Actually I've been in Waterford for 2 years, spending weekends in Dublin. Prior to that I spent 6 years in Dublin.

and despite your trips around the mad roundabouts in the Sqr. it obviously hasn't sunk in that there ain't no QBCs from Tallaght to Abbey St!
Click to expand...

And my point was that for the price of Luas you could have built such a QBC quite easily. i.e. in place of tracks you just have Tarmac. And in places where tarmac already exists, you don't have to dig it up and plant tracks.

It would appear that 3 double decker busses would carry 60 to 70 people more than a Luas Tram.

-Rd
 
Isn't the point of the luas rather than buses is the 'lecky' is more efficient in the long run and is 'invoirenmentally furiendely'. I think it looks great and will be a success.
 
'invoirenmentally furiendely'.
Click to expand...

Possibly true. Although you'd have to wonder given how long it's taken, how much it's cost, and how much disruption it's caused if we can afford that kind of 'invoirenmentally furiendely' thinking. I mean QBC's and Buses would have been more 'invoirenmentally furiendely' than Cars. And would it have been that much dirtier than Luas in the long run????

I think it looks great and will be a success.
Click to expand...

QBC's would have been a success. We'd have had them quicker, and there would have been less disruption.

Given the €50 odd million cut in social welfare, have we got our priorities right? It seems that the difference between 100 million and 1 billion is insignificant if we're spending it on certain projects, but the 20 or 30 grand is impossible to find for others.

I don't know. I despair.

-Rd
 
the 'lecky' is more efficient in the long run and is 'invoirenmentally furiendely'.
Click to expand...
...not if (as at the moment) we have to burn millions of tonnes of coal at Moneypoint every year in order to generate the 'lecky'
 
I have never been enthusiastic about LUAS either because I firmly believe we should have gone for the underground option but that's history now.

On the point of QBCs on the Tallaght/Abbey St./Connolly route they would never have made the effort to provide them because:
1. The major mistake of the Madcowroundabout (which is bad enough with trams never mind buses
2. Where would a QBC have gone on places like Greenhills Rd/Crumlin Rd because don't forget everyone agrees the present rambling route for the LUAS takes up far too much travelling time.

I on the one hand look forward to the arrival of LUAS becuase I have had enough of struggling in traffic but on the other hand I also think that it will make the traffic worse. Where it presently goes thru the Belgard Rd. junction it causes the traffic to build up and don't forget its still only testing.

BTW does anyone have any info on the new orbital bus corridor that they're working on on the Belgard Rd. Looked at the SDCC site a while ago but could not find anything sunstantial about it. Am I right in thinking that it will mainly service Tallaght/Clondalkin/Lucan?
 
Luas bashers

The Luas tram system for Dublin will be a huge success.

The trams will be busy, the demand will be strong. Other communties will start demanding that the trams be extended to their areas.

All over Europe cities are building or extending their light rail/tram networks:

Manchester
Edinburgh
Nottingham
Freiburg
Paris
Bordeaux
Geneva
Barcelona

to name but a few.

Light rail is clean, quiet and fast. It helps urban regeneration. It is popular with customers and commuters.

Yes, the Luas was expensive (€690m). That includes two depots, 40 trams and a lot of diversion of underground utilities.

There is one problem with the Luas: it will be a victim of its own success, and the trams will be too packed. The 26 trams on the Tallaght line are shorter at 30m long while the 14 trams on the Sandyford lines are longer at 40m.

At 5-min peak frequencies, I can see the Tallaght trams being packed by the time they reach Heuston. Maybe there should also be short workings from Heuston to Connolly.

I suggest buying the extra 10m module to fit to the Tallaght trams to bring them up to 40m long. BTW, the longest trams in the world are about 45m.

Also, I suggest a move to 4-min frequencies peak, and 10-min off-peak.

I repeat, the trams will be a welcome success. Roll on the 26th June.
 
How negative everyone is (and wrong)

Firstly, last week on Pat Kenny, there was a guy who was talking about building a metro and saying that we should do it. He was giving his reasons why, and there was a discussion about the costs and how it would compare to the Luas, and to QBCs.
He talked about the running costs of these (not the setup costs as these are once off) I don't remember the exact figures he gave, but it was something along the lines of 5000 per passenger per year for a bus (98 passengers * 5k = 0.5million to run a bus per year - insurance/tax/diesel/wages/wages for back office/upkeep of QBC/depreciation costs of bus etc etc).
For the Luas, the running costs are something like 1k per passenger (as the Luas can hold about 200-250 passengers), and for the metro, it is something like 500 per passenger.
So, ignoring the metro, and looking at these figures,

The Luas can transport 5000 people per hour into town.

Assuming a bus takes 98 passengers (a figure someone else used), you would need 50 buses.

I would believe the insurance costs of a bus are substantially higher as they are using the same road as cars (even if it is their own lane). Luas has its own dedicated road (for the most part).
You would need to pay twice the number of drivers for buses, and need 2 actual buses compared to the one tram. (actually, it will be closer to 4 to 1 - see later)

Anyways, load of figures, but if you think about it, it is substantially cheaper to run the Luas - once it is setup.

It is much greener than diesel from buses.
It is quicker to get people into town - and because of this, you will only need about 13 Luas trams (and drivers) per 50 buses.
It is quieter, and while some people will see the negative in this, it is a positive to anyone living near the line.


I am not bothering to talk about the setup costs as this is irrelevant. Over the course of 100 years, the cost of the Luas line is tiny - and there is no reason why this wouldn't run for 100 years).


Another negative I heard was about the MadCow Roundabout.
I know this roundabout extemely well, and anyone who travels it will know that the lights can be synched to a stage where the tram will cross the on/off ramps and main road when the lights are normally red.

I agree that this will be a huge success - at least as big as the Dart. Look at the uproar and inconvience when this closed at the weekends.

Plus, one final thing - it gives the city a huge boost and I have to say I think we are getting there and becoming quite a modern city, with that, the M50 extention, the M1.
Just remember what it was like 20 years ago!

Nation of begrudgers is right.
 
How negative everyone is (and wrong)

> Just remember what it was like 20 years ago!

Not to mention 50+ years ago when we already had a fully fledged tram system up and running!
 
Re: How negative everyone is (and wrong)

I don't think it's anything to do with negativity or begrudgery.
Just because we've spent close to a billion euro on a new transport system doesn't mean we need to praise Jebus for it.

Recognising that something will be beneficial to transport problems and recognising that it was the wrong thing to do in the first place are two different things.

The fact of the matter is, Dublin is growing (outwards) and logically what we need is an underground system. We're going to need it in the future regardless...so why not have spent that billion euro investing in it instead. I have no idea how much an underground system would cost, however, if the LUAS is anything to go by multiply it by 5 to find out it's real cost.
 
Re: How negative everyone is (and wrong)

On LINE B Sandyford from the RPA
We are scheduled to carry passengers in June 2004 - end of.
Click to expand...

Good bad or indifferent it is nearly here. The arguements of Luas vs Metro for this line don't really count as the line is built to take metro trains when/if the upgrade comes.

I'm happy anyway as I live 5 mins from a station so I'd like to thank you all for paying your taxes and building me a nice public transport system near my house and not yours.

Nogser
 
Re: How negative everyone is (and wrong)

QBC's would have been a success. We'd have had them quicker, and there would have been less disruption.
Click to expand...
On the Harcourt street line this would have been the same as we still would have to build the old/new bridges relay foundations etc. Probably a bit dearer for the tallaght line but we still would have to have put new roads in place (re: Maryland old canal, middle lane of Nass road).
Regarding cost, nobody has mentioned the amount of employment it has created.
I was not a fan of luas at the start but I'm coming around to the idea now that I see an end result.
 
Re: How negative everyone is (and wrong)

Dublins traffic problems will never be solved as it has been allowed to grow outwards instead of upwards. Take a look at LA - because that's what Dublin is going to be like. Until teleportation is commonly available ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top