Finance Bill 2022: unlimited employer contributions to PRSAs permitted from 2023?

L

LDFerguson

Registered User
Messages
4,663
Some interesting developments in the pensions area in the Finance Bill, published yesterday. If it is signed into law in December unaltered it will allow employers to make much larger contributions to a PRSA than were permitted. At the moment, there are those who interpret the bill as saying that employer contributions to PRSAs will be unlimited. Others believe that employer contributions to PRSAs will be the same as what was previously allowed under Occupational Pension Schemes, i.e. very generous limits. Either way, it's a big improvement for PRSAs.

Looks like from 2023 onwards, the choices for employees and directors of smaller companies (including one-employee companies) will be Master Trust Occupational Pension Schemes or PRSAs.

More details here.

Regards,

Liam
www.FergA.com
 
Last edited:
I saw the headline, haven't read the detail of the Finance Bill yet. it will certainly make a difference for people who take a relatively small salary from their business. With no funding limits, they can just load up on their pension contributions.
 
I read that change as employer contributions to PRSAs no longer being 'treated' as a (non taxable) BIK and included in Gross Pay. In other words treated the same as employer contributions to a normal pension scheme.
 
Towger said:
I read that change as employer contributions to PRSAs no longer being 'treated' as a (non taxable) BIK and included in Gross Pay. In other words treated the same as employer contributions to a normal pension scheme.
Click to expand...

But employer PRSA contributions are also no longer to be subject to the age-related tax relief limits as they are now.
 
LDFerguson said:
But employer PRSA contributions are also no longer to be subject to the age-related tax relief limits as they are now.
Click to expand...
Liam
Is that the Case? The Bill refers to PEPP's and still includes the age limits for tax allowed contributions .
 
Conan said:
Liam
Is that the Case? The Bill refers to PEPP's and still includes the age limits for tax allowed contributions .
Click to expand...

I suppose I'll have to wait until the pension companies' legal people have fully taken it apart, but it certainly looks that way to me.

In the Explanatory Memorandum on Page 7 it says...

Section 18 amends section 118 of the TCA 1997 to exempt an employer contribution to an employee’s PRSA or PEPP from an income tax charge to Benefit-in-kind (BIK). This is a recommendation of the Inter-departmental Pensions Reform and Taxation Group (IDPRTG). The section also deletes subsection (2) of section 787E TCA 1997, which treated both employer and employee contributions to a PRSA for the purposes of the tax relief as if they had been made by the employee. This is no longer required following the abolition of the BIK charge.

 
It’s seismic.

For someone who has just started work, the employer can contribute €1bn, for example. The only constraint is the €2.15m.
 
Thanks Liam. My reading was that the Employer contribution to a PRSA would no longer be treated as a BIK but that the total age limits would still apply (as with PEPPs). The Bill specifically includes the age limits in dealing with PEPPs.
 
Gordon Gekko said:
It’s seismic.

For someone who has just started work, the employer can contribute €1bn, for example. The only constraint is the €2.15m.
Click to expand...
Sounds too good to be true, and this is Ireland, so we can safely assume it is too good to be true.
 
T McGibney said:
Sounds too good to be true, and this is Ireland, so we can safely assume it is too good to be true.
Click to expand...

As I think about this I'm inclined to agree that it does sound too good to be true. One of the pension companies believe it to be true. However, reading PwC's Finance Bill summary, they seem to be of the opinion that employer contributions to a PRSA will be elevated to the same levels as employer contributions to Occupational Pension Schemes which will still be a huge improvement for PRSAs. I think I'll edit this post until the position has been clarified.
 
Gordon Gekko said:
It’s seismic.

For someone who has just started work, the employer can contribute €1bn, for example. The only constraint is the €2.15m.
Click to expand...
Section 81 of the tca would rule that out. I’d imagine this will ironed out to equalize the funding as that appears to have been the idea with the reference to the tax report
 
Gordon Gekko said:
It’s seismic.

For someone who has just started work, the employer can contribute €1bn, for example. The only constraint is the €2.15m.
Click to expand...

From what I've seen, if the billion is lobbed into Standard Life's GARS at the beginning of one's career, then it would be unlikely that the €2m threshold would be breached by the time retirement comes around.
 
Last edited:
Oisin19 said:
Section 81 of the tca would rule that out. I’d imagine this will ironed out to equalize the funding as that appears to have been the idea with the reference to the tax report
Click to expand...
I’m talking about the position as it stands.

As things stand, and based on the legislation as presented, an infinite employer contribution to a PRSA is possible.

Your reference to Section 81 TCA 1997 is foolish; if commercially an employer wants to pay an employee, say, a €1bn employer pension contribution, than that’s deductible.
 
How is it foolish? It is the section that gives the deductibility? You don’t think it should be considered by a company when making a business expense? In what scenario could you just employ someone and pay them 1bn?
 
Last edited:
Oisin19 said:
How is it foolish? It is the section that gives the deductibility? You don’t think it should be considered by a company when making a business expense? In what scenario could you just employ someone and pay them 1bn?
Click to expand...
A scenario in which they’re employed and paid €1bn.
 
It looks like this bill is due to be signed into law. Am I correct in saying that companies can now make larger contributions to an employees pension?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top