I have searched through various threads and while I found this mentioned in one I did not see a definitive answer.
Does anyone know if you can get in to negative equity with affordable housing? If a property increases in value or stays the same you are liable to pay clawback to the council.
However, if the property falls well below the market value is it true that you would be liable for the remainder of your mortgage only and not the clawback? For example:
- you buy a property at a third of its market value (200k instead of 300k)
- if you go to sell after 5 years you would normally be liable for 33.3% clawback here.
- there is a price crash after 5 years - the market value falls to 200k
- you can sell the property, repay your mortgage and not have to repay the clawback?
Is this safety net really in place with affordable housing? Seems too good to be true?
Any info or referrals to official docs would be very welcome.
Does anyone know if you can get in to negative equity with affordable housing? If a property increases in value or stays the same you are liable to pay clawback to the council.
However, if the property falls well below the market value is it true that you would be liable for the remainder of your mortgage only and not the clawback? For example:
- you buy a property at a third of its market value (200k instead of 300k)
- if you go to sell after 5 years you would normally be liable for 33.3% clawback here.
- there is a price crash after 5 years - the market value falls to 200k
- you can sell the property, repay your mortgage and not have to repay the clawback?
Is this safety net really in place with affordable housing? Seems too good to be true?
Any info or referrals to official docs would be very welcome.