Scientists who's job it is to make these decisions.
They're obviously all mad and overreacting. I know that, because a random guy in the internet said it!
As well as the WHO and EMA ...
Scientists who's job it is to make these decisions.
They're obviously all mad and overreacting. I know that, because a random guy in the internet said it!
Those notoriously shifty Norwegians... and as for the Danes, sure they all used to be Vikings!So, MM called Norway and they made up a story about blood clots while they were doing that he called Denmark and other countries to come out in solidarity once the Norwegians issued a statement on Saturday night. He then called the NIAC and they advised to stop using the Astrazeneca vaccine.
Ah yes, but the EMA is just a bunch of failed bureaucrats, so why would we listen to them?...As well as the WHO and EMA ...
Ah yes, but the EMA is just a bunch of failed bureaucrats, so why would we listen to them?...
Scientists in a number of countries have found evidence which suggests the possibility of causality. The rollout has been suspended until that has been investigated. None of us here have enough information to offer definitive or even informed opinions on the evidence. We can only speculate on the integrity of those involved. That is reductive and pointless.I know.
It would be like paying for the opinion of a doctor who has studied all the clinical evidence then ignoring it because you heard on the news about some other person in a different country who might have a different opinion but with any facts just a funny feeling.
Crazy isn't it ?
I couldn't agree more.I know.
It would be like paying for the opinion of a doctor who has studied all the clinical evidence then ignoring it because you heard on the news about some other person in a different country who might have a different opinion but with any facts just a funny feeling.
Crazy isn't it ?
None of us here have enough information to offer definitive or even informed opinions on the evidence.
You seem confused in your posts.I couldn't agree more.
We should really try to get a bunch of highly qualified people together, and make it their responsibility to make decisions like this. You know the type, highly qualified doctors, professors, etc.
If only someone had the foresight to set something like that up, rather than reacting to internet news...
Oh, wait a minute. Is that what these guys do?
Personally for me the WHO is compromised but nevermind.As well as the WHO and EMA ...
in fact all clinical trials point towards a lower risk of clots by those who have had a vaccine.Any vaccine.
Can you point to the evidence of that?
Thanks. I didn't realise I was confused. I'm so lucky to have you point this out to me.You seem confused in your posts
If one million people are vaccinated and their chances of death or hospialisation is reduced by 100% the risk of the catching Covid and the associated clots that go with it is significantly less than someone who hasn't been vaccinated who has a greater chance of catching Covid.
That's not evidence, just a repeat of your claim. Where is the evidence?
If you won't accept the very clear statistical evidence that a vaccine that prevents you catching Covid 19 and the clots that are often associated with it reduces your chances of getting blood clots then I'm afraid there's really no help for you.
So you can't supply evidence to show that the vaccine has been proven to reduce the risk of clotting?
It reduces the risk of clotting because it virtually eliminates the chance of catching Covid which greatly increases the risk of clotting.
Is that really so hard to understand ?
So still no actual evidence.
However, the above clearly demonstrates that you do not understand what is being discussed here. The clotting risk being assessed is the risk of someone who has been inoculated with the AZ vaccine against the risk of a someone who has not been inoculated, neither groups having contracted Covid.
Can you point to your evidence of the 'greatly increased' risk of clotting associated with Covid?
There is endless amounts of evidence showing the associated risk of clotting with Covid if you could be bothered to do your own research.Can you point to your evidence of the 'greatly increased' risk of clotting associated with Covid?