Response to 1.
Any reference to European countries is irrelevant. We are Irish and will never return to rent paying society. We aint gonna do it. Full stop.
But do you not think that these taxes were needed to support our growing country. Regardless of how we think about the actual expenditure i would think that most people would agree that they are needed. If the govt were to start giving money back how do you think they would finance it? Should education, health infrastructure be cut back to hand out money to those who feel short changed by the housing boom?Response to 2.
Cost related taxes on top of something that was rising by 30% per year is not alike any other charge and should be considered in isolation.
A pal of mine living in France reckoned house price inflation didnt happen there due to house purchase tax of 20%, but at our 6 - 9% on a much dearer house were paying more than their 20% of a cheaper house.
Any reference to European countries is irrelevant.
Since the Government made 33% out of homeowners on the way up I'd say there is strong arguement for putting some of that 33% back to the homeowner if they fall in to trouble.
I wouldnt call it 'bailing out'.
when you can decide what happens to the government who handed free rein to the building industry in return for a feed at the trough.
do you really think kenny and co would have been able to take on the feel good factor of the economy that was the property boom.
I'm paying €1150pm for a lovely apartment.The lowest asking price for a similar apartment is €450k which would cost €2400pm to buy.Response to 1.
Any reference to European countries is irrelevant. We are Irish and will never return to rent paying society. We aint gonna do it. Full stop.
I'm paying €1150pm for a lovely apartment.The lowest asking price for a similar apartment is €450k which would cost €2400pm to buy.
I'll be renting for a fair while yet
I'm paying €1150pm for a lovely apartment.The lowest asking price for a similar apartment is €450k which would cost €2400pm to buy.
I'll be renting for a fair while yet
Bailing out is exactly what it is - how will handing money back to people who were foolish enough to overpay for a house get us out of a recession? What taxes do you want to see raised and what services do you want cut to give you your 33% back?
You made you own decision and have no recourse except your vote in the next election, when you can decide what happens to the government who handed free rein to the building industry in return for a feed at the trough.
From where? How many people should receive this money and how much? Multiply A by B and what number do you come up with?You might say the state benefited for the good of all its people but if people they extracted from now get into trouble then let some of that 'goodness' flow back to them. They deserve it.
er... no bail out to encourage further house purchases.
yes - to assistance aid home owners in financial trouble - mostly not of their own making.
Where are you renting an appartment for that price?? I assume its one bedroom? A two bedroom apartment outside the city centre is not going to be worth 450k
Dont you see the Government fueled and fed from the boom. You might say the state benefited for the good of all its people but if people they extracted from now get into trouble then let some of that 'goodness' flow back to them. They deserve it. I think it its a tough call to say people in trouble should sink. It is our government after all and is supposed to be benevelant if its anything. Its not as if were ruled by a foriegn government 'not of the people' any more. .
As regard this 'choice' posters here seem to think existed. As rents followed houses prices up (and there is a correlation) what choices had renters. They had to pay thru the nose for the boom also.
In fact the aprtment pricing was often sold to prospective purchasers as not being much more of a monthly cost than the cost of renting.
It wasent a great choice. A real choice is cheap lodgings over expensive lodgings - and there aint any cheap lodging in this country.
Fustratingly moving to an underpopulated part of the country for cheap land or houses should have meant there was choice to do just that but once the boom started even the cow shed ruins in the back end of nowhere were carrying an inflated pricetag.
There was no escaping the house price inflation and no choice.
As regard this 'choice' posters here seem to think existed. As rents followed houses prices up (and there is a correlation) what choices had renters. They had to pay thru the nose for the boom also.
In fact the aprtment pricing was often sold to prospective purchasers as not being much more of a monthly cost than the cost of renting.
Buying provides security and a sense of home but it definitely isn't cheaper in the short/medium term
Unless you're Methuselah I don't think 10 years is medium term in terms of where someone lives. I'm in my 30's and have yet to live in any one location for more than 4 years during my student/working life.disagree with you there. Lets say medium term is over 7 to ten years.
This is incorrect and is borne out by even our own CSO stats which only go back about 40 years - no need to even bring up the ongoing 20 year downcycle in Japan, 10 year down cycle in Germany ...Take any 7 to 10 year period in history + house prices have risen.
Oh, has this become a Dublin only site?Where are you renting an appartment for that price?? I assume its one bedroom? A two bedroom apartment outside the city centre is not going to be worth 450k
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?