They were all bitten by the same desire for a quick buck without considering the longer term implications to their business - greed and stupidity!
[broken link removed]
This but might interest television
EDIT: Link fixed
Plenty of jobs are specific to one location - pharmaceuticals to cork, ifsc to dublin etc. and people develop specialised skills in these areas which can mean they are unable to find employment in other parts of the country. Renting is not much cheaper than a mortgage (and a long way from being affordable) and is too insecure for most families with young children. So ftb's should all walk backwards to mullingar and have a two hours commute to their work/family/friends - some choice!
And since you think that young people have only themselves to blame take a look at the title of the thread again - proposals for the government to bail out the banks & property developers by stitching up ftb's again.
You might want to check up on Japan a bit more - it's housing boom went hand in hand with it's economic boom, same as in Ireland.
Interest rates are an ineffective tool for controlling house prices - look at the uk. Raising them to control house prices damages other areas of the economy, such as manufacturing by raising their costs & pushing of the price of sterling in countries they try to export to.
My argument is that the govt should have taken steps to limit borrowing to prudent levels of 3xearnings & 90% mortgage over 20/25 years max which would have controlled prices without harming the economy.
Your talking a small proportion and surely your choices are made with future employment in mind i.e should I train in an area that only offers employment in one place in the country or am I maximsing my risk to unemployment, high costs etc by doing so.
I don't recall saying young people have themselves to blame for anything its that they and everyone else have choices to make and have to work around their means, plus i have said all along that there should be no bailing out of anyone.
Wow! That is scary stuff. The good professor says that house prices are set to halve and that we could see a banking crisis this autumn. Is he over egging it a bit or is it really that bad?
My argument is that the govt should have taken steps to limit borrowing to prudent levels of 3xearnings & 90% mortgage over 20/25 years max which would have controlled prices without harming the economy.
Here are the [broken link removed] that he referes to. Note the dramatic peak in 1980 (74K) and subsequest collapse by 1994 (48K). This peak is often incorrectly referred to in support of boom times becoming boomier, failing to note the consquences of the subsequent collapse in births. Morgan Kellys article finally addresses that issue in print.Jetro, article is pretty good I have to say. Particularly gloomy but there is nothing I disagree with it in it, except for population. Maybe its a hunch but I get the feeling population will increase pretty dramatically in dublin over the next 20 years.
I don't understand your question - How would [prudent levels of lending] not have harmed the economy?How would that not have harmed the economy?
And you trust the irish banks to be responsible lenders? Have you forgotten the dirt & overcharging scandals and the fact that while the banks were wheeling out their economists to promote ever higher house prices (& mortgages) they were busy selling off their own branches & headquarters.It is up to the banks to be responsible lenders.
Hunches are rarely a substitute for proper research on such things.
If you're bored then simply don't read it. Since housing is the biggest financial decision people make in their lifetimes why shouldn't it be discussed on an askaboutmoney website?
Greed did fuel a lot of it and I would say that there are Ea's and developers who would say now that the 15 year boom has worked well for them. I would think a lot of people thought make hay while the sun shines and its hard to argue with that. The banks on the other hand had more reason to look long term.
If you're bored then simply don't read it. Since housing is the biggest financial decision people make in their lifetimes why shouldn't it be discussed on an askaboutmoney website?
If you're bored then simply don't read it. Since housing is the biggest financial decision people make in their lifetimes why shouldn't it be discussed on an askaboutmoney website?
I agree, plenty of other threads for you to read. You don't need to look beyond the subject if you don't want to.
I think some of us read it because we think it relates to the thread title ..how silly! This is the second thread that has developed into an general housing market discussion, with the same contributors arguing back and forth, with the same type of posts,
Why is it such an issue. Get a mod to change the thread title and let the posters who wish to contribute do so.
Yes some of what is said is repetitive but this is a discussion forum if you cannot discuss things it becomes some what pointless
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?