If, for example, there are 2000 people involved in payroll and associated HR functions and that number can be reduced to 1000 the surplus 1000 staff cannot be redeployed as classroom assistants or to homecare for the elderly.
I agree. So there needs to be headcount reductions in some areas and new hires in others. That, of course, won't happen.Of course, because that is not in their terms of employment.
It would be very difficult to do this in a private sector organisation either.
I wouldn't work for an organisation that reserved the right to deploy me as a refuse collector tomorrow.
Do you really think there is a net shortage of administration staff in the State sector?Of course, but they may be deployed elsewhere as administrative support to many other schemes or services that are understaffed.
I agree. So there needs to be headcount reductions in some areas and new hires in others. That, of course, won't happen.
So those excess staff in Irish Water are gone, yes?People are hired all the time in the public service. Sometimes there are redundancy schemes too.
Staff are also re-deployed all the time in response to business needs, both in terms of location and job role.
I don't think you know very much about the public service at all. I'm out.
Do you really think there is a net shortage of administration staff in the State sector?
I include those directly employed by the State and those employed in organisations which are funded by the State.
Nobody disagrees with the Fiscal Council's report
but everyone knows that there is nothing the government can do about the gross waste of money in the State sector
If it was a given then the conversation when someone or something needs/wants more money would be where else is that money going to be cut from.Because nobody can plausibly disagree with the concept that financial prudence, living within budgetary constraints is not sound responsible advice.
I think we can take that it as a given.
The problems arise when we look beyond the highly constrained and the limited remit of the FAC, which is what every government faces.
As a voice against the left wing populism of RTE and the Trade Union backed establishment it is money well spent.Starting with the €1m budget allocated to an advisory council that is limited in its remit as to what it can advise on, which on the face of it is nothing more than offering sound prudent financial advice that anyone can already take as a given.
If it was a given then the conversation when someone or something needs/wants more money would be where else is that money going to be cut from
As a voice against the left wing populism of RTE and the Trade Union backed establishment it is money well spent.
What economies of scale in the provision of public services do other countries enjoy that we cannot enjoy?Just to set out issues faced by any Irish government.
We have a small population and a small economy.
We cannot benefit from the economies of scale in public services that countries with larger populations and economies enjoy.
That should not increase the cost of the provision of public services. It can increase the cost of business but we generally get over that.We are situated on the periphery.
I agree, I’ve made that point plenty of times on this site. That doesn’t justify inefficiency where it exists nor should it be used as a lazy excuse for the obvious waste and duplication of processes within large public sector organisations.Sometimes people do not understand scalability, i.e., what works for small or micro firms will not necessarily work for large corporations, multinationals or government departments. This often leads to persistently naïve incorrect assumptions of inefficiencies.
That’s a very strange metaphor. Ask yourself which would cost more; a State owned company building the ocean liner or a Privately owned company building an ocean liner.For instance, a canoe made from fibre glass or aluminium is fine. Problems start when people cannot understand why a large ocean liner cannot be built from the same fibre glass or aluminium.
Agreed. It is also self evident that some people hide behind byzantine organisational structures and pretend that they are necessary rather than admitting that they are just badly structures organisations run by people without the skills, mindset or ability to fix them.It is often self-evident that people confuse accountancy - essentially analyzing income and expenses; with economics - essentially concerned with production, consumption, and transfer of resources.
We have a small open economy and, even within that SME sector, have very high levels of exports. Wealth is created through internationally traded goods and services. It is a fallacy to suggest that we need to steal taxes from other countries in order to provide the services which the public need and more than pay for.Our private sector, mostly composed of micro and small firms, when compared to large firms and multi-nationals cannot compete and provide sufficient employment or sufficiently high pay to assist our tax intake and our population is too small to buy the goods or use the services that Irish firms offer
That’s a very strange metaphor. Ask yourself which would cost more; a State owned company building the ocean liner or a Privately owned company building an ocean liner.
We have a small open economy and, even within that SME sector, have very high levels of exports. Wealth is created through internationally traded goods and services. It is a fallacy to suggest that we need to steal taxes from other countries in order to provide the services which the public need and more than pay for.
|
We are especially bad, by any standard. According to this report in 2014 we spent the second highest amount on healthcare per capita in the OECD with the worst outcomes. That despite having one of the youngest populations. Hiding behind "but we are a large organisation, you just don't understand" is unacceptable.My analogy was not particularly about public v private sector but rather that structures and systems that work for small enterprises do not work for large enterprises.
That tells us that our Public Service funding model is built on stealing tax revenue from other countries, many of them far poorer than us. It also shows how tenuous and fragile out tax base is (Corporation Tax is the new bubble).I agree that because our economy is small, exports are vital for economic growth.
According to CSO statistics for 2017, the latest published:
SMEs, which composed 96% of enterprises had 30% of the total value of exports.
Large enterprises, which composed 3% of enterprises had 68% of the total value of exports.
See table below.
Note: The SMEs figures are the combined figures, with some rounding, for micro, small and medium enterprises.
Table 2.1 Exports by enterprise size 2017
€millionEnterprise size
Value% of totalNumber of enterprises% of totalMicro
7,50665,08159Small
5,28442,38428Medium
23,1681983510SMEs
35,957308,30096Large
82,964682893Unknown
2,8382250Total
121,7591008,614100Micro (0-9 employees), Small (10-49 employees), Medium (50-249 employees), Large (over 250 employees).
We can see that the majority of exporting enterprises (59%) are micro, but they only account for 6% of the value of exports.
Large enterprises are mostly foreign owned.
We are especially bad, by any standard. According to this report in 2014 we spent the second highest amount on healthcare per capita in the OECD with the worst outcomes. That despite having one of the youngest populations. Hiding behind "but we are a large organisation, you just don't understand" is unacceptable.
Sorry, worst value for money, not worst outcomes.Ireland does not have the worst health outcomes in the OECD. Look at the chart in the article.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?