Positively
Registered User
- Messages
- 14
Which is subject to reinvestment risk (ie the rates on the instant access deposits might fall).2.01% AER is poor to lock up funds for ten years. There are better rates here with instant access:
I don’t think anybody should invest in stocks with an investment horizon of just 5-10 years.Some of it should be invested in stocks so that he sees that it goes up and down.
Select companies/shares that don't pay dividends and you don't have any tax filing issues until you sell and have to deal with CGT. That's one reason that I hold a chunk of Berkshire Hathaway. Another is that it's an already diversified conglomerate - I didn't want the hassle of selecting and managing a diversified basket of shares.Plus you would have all the hassle of filing tax returns, etc.
Every investment option involves risks.TBH, I don’t think the OP should be taking any real risks with her son’s inheritance over such a short holding period. At the end of the day, it’s not her money.
Profound.Every investment option involves risks.
€70,000 is the deposit for a house. Locking it up for explicitly ten years as a young adult is also a risk, what if they need it sooner?
Sure, but you forgo all the interest so you may as well have stuffed it under the mattress.It is not locked up for 10 years, you can exit at any stage, and a get a full refund in a matter of a week or two, they come with near zero risk, usual government guarantee, and zero charges,
not accurate, interest is mainly accrued from year 5 onwards, but it is a sliding scale, based on what year you withdraw, explained in full in table 1, part 2.4:Sure, but you forgo all the interest so you may as well have stuffed it under the mattress.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?