D
they did ask could a family member pay off my debts
Seems to be an unnecessary slur - MABS is Govt funded and locally managed. There is no vested interest, and I think it's pretty unfair to imply that this might be possible without any real evidence.bond-007 said:Seems to be common theme with mabs, thats why i didn't trust them. Possible vested interest? who knows?
I'd imagine that borrowing from family members to defray debts is just one of the solutions that MABS might propose in this sort of situation. Maybe somebody with direct experience can comment? I'm not sure how they would have a vested interest and how suggesting family borrowing might tie in with any vested interest. Perhaps you could explain?bond-007 said:Seems to be common theme with mabs, thats why i didn't trust them. Possible vested interest? who knows?
I'd agree that your experience was unsatisfactory. Perhaps it is worth highlighting this to local MABS chairperson? Certainly, I'd expect them to provide more options.bond-007 said:When I went to see them some time ago, thats all they would go on about. They were not interested in talking to creditors etc. It did not instill confidence in me. I ended up making direct contact with creditors instead.
Seems like a very impudent attitude to have with them I have to say. They are merely a advice and support agency and are not ultimately responsible for the debts that individuals get themselves into and for which they themselves are responsible.alpha said:to be honest i now find mabs very helpful. in the begining they wanted me to contact the creditors myself but that soon came to a stop after i had words with them. i told them that that should be their job.
They are not in business - they are a free support and advisory service. I have no direct experience of them but reckon that they provide a very useful service to those who, for whatever reason find themselves in financial difficulties. But I certainly don't think that taxpayers money should be unduly spent on free advice to people who often should know better than to get themselves into significant debts and then expect somebody else to bail them out of their situations. Without engaging in the sort of "Nanny State" knocking that can crop up at times, I do wonder if Governments sometimes spend too much time and resources protecting people from their own actions...otherwise why are they in the business?
Brendan said:I doubt it's MABS policy to show people how to exploit the legal system to avoid making payments.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?