seanistaken
Registered User
- Messages
- 21
Architects usually have copyright on their work, any such reference on the documents you were provided with?
There is no mention of copyright on the documents I have.
I know I am getting into a grey area which might not be suitable for this forum, but to what degree would the plans have to be changed in order to avoid copyright infringement? I am not sure how you would even answer that question to be honest but its the question that springs to mind.
I'm currently discussing our build with an architect and he was going through pricing options with me.
He mentioned that if they had already drawn up plans that were similar to what we wanted, then it would be a lot cheaper than getting bespoke plans drawn up from scratch. He didn't give an exact figure but he brought it up, not me, so I'm guessing it is quite common practice and worth asking about. I'm sure he'd be happy to help you out.
Who do you plan to sue when you find that your house isn't level, or isn't safe in case of fire?
I don't understand what you are implying. Are you saying that repurposing plans is risky or that no one will be accountable using this approach? Or are you saying something else?
I understand exactly where you are coming from. We got a plan we liked in a plan design book and gave it to a friend with our own requirements. Friend drew up plans at a fraction of the cost of an architect. Long story short, a few inconsistencies in measurements arose, and had to be sorted out by me, not technical at all, finishes were not so good, no great snagging process. Heel of the hunt, sorry I did not hire the meanest nastiest architect around, even if it cost 5 times the friend's cost.
I do not think the copying of the plan can be traced and lots do it from plan books. Not every new house is 'designed' afresh by an architect. There are only so many configurations you can have in a regular house.
I dont remember any explicit agreement regarding ownership or copyright.
I think people are possibly confusing things a little as to the OPs query?
The OP just wants a copy of the plans.
If the original architect was to sell the OP a set of plans, they are only likely to be a complete set of the design plans (plans, sections and elevations), and, I would suggest not tender construction drawings, because Building Regulations have most likely changed since the house was built.
If the original architect was happy to sell the OP a set of the design plans, I'm pretty sure they would come with a disclaimer, that the OP might have to sign, basically stating that it would be OP's responsibilty to prepare his own planning drawings, tender/construction drawings and generally satisfy himself that (current) Building Regulations are complied with, etc., etc.
OP then employs his own AT and/or engineer to take the original design plans as simply a template and then, from these, do planning drawings, apply for planning permission, prepare tender/construction drawings, oversee construction, certify, etc., etc.
I'm pretty sure this is what the OP intends to do?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?