aircobra19
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,733
is good enough, but hasn't? Given that waiting lists have fallen drastically, what's their excuse for not having a full licence?
Believe me, I would love to be able to take the test asap and get my full licence, but it is just not facilitated sufficiently.
I think they should have addressed the waiting lists better before introducing this.
Not being smart, but you failed within last 2 months - what makes you think you'd pass if you sat it tomorrow?
Taking lessons and practicing in the interim, I failed by one fault. The tester himself even told me to reapply asap before I had the chance to pick up bad habits....
They have - average waiting time between 6 and 14 weeks depending on the centre, and plenty of people are still not turning up. This means someone has the opportunity to do at least 3 tests in space of a year. When I applied I was waiting almost a year.
Some faults earned in this test have little bearing upon safety such as faulting someone for revving slightly too much on a hill start or when moving off. Revving creates a safeguard against a cut out of the engine. Its better to over rev than under rev. Im sure someone will disagree with me and bite my head off for daring to have a view such as this . So what if it damages a car , thats the owner of the cars problem. Skills such as observation and anticipation on the road are most important imo.
Its better to over rev than under rev.
L drivers are responsible for 25% of road accidents, the balance caused by ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?