Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,725
I think you've misread the situation here Brendan, nobody wants to hold on to the land. The OP's sister is suggesting splitting the proceeds equally between the children, not the land.I presume that she has some emotional attachment to the land?
It seems impractical to hold onto it if no one wants it.
We now are thinking it's best we sell it which we agree on but my sister has mentioned splitting it with our kids she has 4 boys late twenties early 30s and I have two ages 6 and 7.
Well then it should remain 50/50 as per the will. The grandchildren weren’t included in the will it seems so are not relevant.Unfortunately no it's a kinda sad really. Jst my sister and I. No body interested in farming
We now are thinking it's best we sell it which we agree on but my sister has mentioned splitting it with our kids she has 4 boys late twenties early 30s and I have two ages 6 and 7.
I think you've misread the situation here Brendan, nobody wants to hold on to the land.
...but not 6 equal amounts. OP's entitled to 50% so if the proceeds are to be divided after sale, it would be 3 sixths between his two and 3 sixths amongst her 4 kids.It sounds like a cheeky try-on. Pool the money and split it six ways.
Watch that one. She sounds like a chancer.
...but not 6 equal amounts. OP's entitled to 50% so if the proceeds are to be divided after sale, it would be 3 thirds between his two and 3 thirds amongst her 4 kids.
Try again!
Thanks, Micks'rTry again!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?