M Markjbloggs Registered User Messages 384 11 Dec 2007 #1 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CEEDE1739F935A25750C0A966958260
G gillarosa Registered User Messages 492 11 Dec 2007 #2 Yes, I guess it not for nothing that they have had concerns about the line and want it away from their homes and "to sea"
Yes, I guess it not for nothing that they have had concerns about the line and want it away from their homes and "to sea"
M MOB Registered User Messages 1,284 11 Dec 2007 #3 The linked article seems to make it clear that the accident was of a type which could not happen with natural gas.
The linked article seems to make it clear that the accident was of a type which could not happen with natural gas.
P Purple Registered User Messages 14,303 11 Dec 2007 #4 MOB said: The linked article seems to make it clear that the accident was of a type which could not happen with natural gas. Click to expand... I'm sure that won't matter when the local and rent-a-crowd "activists" get their hands on it.
MOB said: The linked article seems to make it clear that the accident was of a type which could not happen with natural gas. Click to expand... I'm sure that won't matter when the local and rent-a-crowd "activists" get their hands on it.