Voluntary surrender in exchange for write down

M

michaelg

Registered User
Messages
182
Bank are about to appoint a receiver to my property, Is it better to sign a voluntary surrender willingly or try to negotiate a deal to sign it in exchange for a write down ?

It would seem to me that I should not sign a surrender unless a shortfall solution has been agreed,


Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
 
Ulster bank, things are changing so fast with banks now, it's difficult to know what to do,

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
 
A friend of mine got a writedown of 2M last week with Ulster so they are doing deals.
I dont know any more details. If I was you I would try and get a writedown as it would
prevent them tormenting you in the future.
 
If they are at the stage of appointing a receiver, I doubt if they will be open to negotiating a deal with you.

They might do a deal afterwards.

Is this for the site you mention in this post?

I think it would be a lot better for everyone if you did a voluntary sale.

Brendan
 
Yes, it's that site,, but why would it be better for me to do a voluntary sale ? Surely I have more leverage in negotiating by not signing ?

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
 
It's very hard to know.

They won't do a deal with you. So you can refuse to sign. They appoint a Receiver - you get no benefit.

If you agree to sign, they might cooperate with a PIA or other arrangement afterwards.

Brendan
 
Strangely I had a call yesterday from a bank official, he said if I submit a sfs on Monday over the phone, they could stop the receiver.

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
 
Spoke to bank last week and they offered me a 6mths moratorium which I declined, it's for a site which I know I've lost anyway.. Now they want me to meet one of their representatives which I've agreed to,,

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
 
Ulster bank never followed through with a meeting and instead appointed a receiver,,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register