Condition was first diagnosed this week.
VHI are refusing to cover as they say that although not diagnosed they were present at the time the policy was taken out which is 2 years ago.
Is the burden of proof on them to prove they would have been present 2 years ago before the policy commenced?
hi
As far as i know the doctor is to state the onset date of the illness-speak to the consultant and see what they have to say.
If you get no joy, then i would send in a letter of complaint and attach the info from the consultant/doctor with the onset of the illness date on it.l
This policy on pre existing conditions seems a bit mad - what if you had a genetic defect that existed since birth but was only diagnosed in your 20's or 30's - would your VHI cover the surgery or treatment to remedy it?
correct.I think most health insurers have waiting/exclusion periods for certain pre-existing conditions.
I guess if you notice yourself getting older then thats going to exclude a lot of things. Lots of things have symptoms that could be a minor, like cold or infection, but are much more serious which only becomes apparent over time. Seems to me like this is a real get out clause though I realise there are people who abuse it, this is taking it a bit far. Who wants to intentionally delay their treatment?
I no its kinda off topic but do other insurers have the same condition?
I think it's used as a get out clause for the insurers no doubt. Someone I know was told initially by their health insurer that they would cover the cost of an op to get tonsils removed (person was in their late twenties going for the op). When they went to claim cost of the operation back, the insurer said they noted from medical records that the person had had a minor throat infection at age 10, therefore the condition was pre-existing???
I can't imagine there are many people around who have not had some form of throat infection over their entire lifespan, but to blame the need for a tonsilectomy in adulthood on a minor throat infection at age 10, to get out of paying for the op sounds ludicrous.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?