Unfortunately, I've found myself having to make several large claims against our dental policy and am shocked at the difference in advertised/perceived cover vs. what they will actually cover. Long story short as the result of an accident I've had to claim for several implants and implant-supported crowns for my partner.
Our VHI Corporate Dental Policy claims 70% cover for implants and implant-supported crowns in the Headline of the policy, the Key Benefits Section of the Policy and again in the Table of Benefits but the table then enforces a separate annual maximum of €250 for implants and €600 for crowns. These maximums apply regardless of the number of implants and implant-supported crowns required. The cost of an implant is €1000 and the implant-supported crown is €1500 bringing the true level of cover to 25% for a single implant and 40% cover for the implant-supported crown. In our case, the replacement of several teeth is required so the actual % level of cover is substantially less.
I'm considering making a complaint to the FSPO regarding this as VHI has already conceded that they have made multiple "human errors" in the admin and processing of related claims to date. I contented that they mislead us and frustrated our attempts to claim for treatments covered under the policy and they admit several human errors were made in the processing of our claims and offered a small sum in compensation. I suppose my question is, is their wording/descriptions appropriate and is it something worth submitting a complaint about? I would have thought phrases like a maximum of 70% cover, up to 70% cover would be more suitable or is it acceptable to frustrate this level of cover by placing such restrictions in the table of benefits?
For reference, ToB is here https://www.vhi.ie/pdf/myvhi/TOBVDC1 V10 Jan21.pdf and some screenshots highlighting the prominence of the 70% cover claims.




Our VHI Corporate Dental Policy claims 70% cover for implants and implant-supported crowns in the Headline of the policy, the Key Benefits Section of the Policy and again in the Table of Benefits but the table then enforces a separate annual maximum of €250 for implants and €600 for crowns. These maximums apply regardless of the number of implants and implant-supported crowns required. The cost of an implant is €1000 and the implant-supported crown is €1500 bringing the true level of cover to 25% for a single implant and 40% cover for the implant-supported crown. In our case, the replacement of several teeth is required so the actual % level of cover is substantially less.
I'm considering making a complaint to the FSPO regarding this as VHI has already conceded that they have made multiple "human errors" in the admin and processing of related claims to date. I contented that they mislead us and frustrated our attempts to claim for treatments covered under the policy and they admit several human errors were made in the processing of our claims and offered a small sum in compensation. I suppose my question is, is their wording/descriptions appropriate and is it something worth submitting a complaint about? I would have thought phrases like a maximum of 70% cover, up to 70% cover would be more suitable or is it acceptable to frustrate this level of cover by placing such restrictions in the table of benefits?
For reference, ToB is here https://www.vhi.ie/pdf/myvhi/TOBVDC1 V10 Jan21.pdf and some screenshots highlighting the prominence of the 70% cover claims.



