Are employment contracts useless ?
Please feel free to correct me,if and where I am incorrect ;
Must employers issue job descriptions to employees, in both public and private sector?
Is it generally stated in contracts and/or job descriptions that 'other tasks' related to the position are part of the job?
If the specific tasks are not specified,is it reasonable to assume that employees don't have to carry out such tasks?
Or does " other tasks related to the position" cover most if not all of what is required to do the job?
If an employee doesn't carry out
'other tasks' related to the position,when it is in the contract,can he/she be disciplined or sacked?
What should an employer do if he/she refuse to carry out these tasks, on the grounds that they are not described/listed in the contract/role description?
Is the way forward to have an exhaustive list of every conceivable task.leading to perhaps hundreds of pages?
Take for example, someone from the passport office on TV yesterday that said he would not deal with customers at the counter ,if it doesnt say in his contract that he has to deal with customers at the counter,and it doesnt state in his contract "other tasks",then why should he deal with them?( feel free to add your own examples of private sectors doing similar).
If it does state "other tasks" in his contract,then why isnt this person being sacked/disciplined?
Why are employers afraid to take action on contracts which are not being carried out by employees?
Should we put up with a reduced service ( Say its a dry cleaners and you go to the counter to collect your item,but the person refuses to serve at the counter ) because the employer is not prepared to enforce the employees contract?
What message would we send to the employer?
Are employment contracts useless ?
I hope in the examples I have given that I have covered both sectors as I dont want this to be about getting at either sector.
Please feel free to correct me,if and where I am incorrect ;
Must employers issue job descriptions to employees, in both public and private sector?
Is it generally stated in contracts and/or job descriptions that 'other tasks' related to the position are part of the job?
If the specific tasks are not specified,is it reasonable to assume that employees don't have to carry out such tasks?
Or does " other tasks related to the position" cover most if not all of what is required to do the job?
If an employee doesn't carry out
'other tasks' related to the position,when it is in the contract,can he/she be disciplined or sacked?
What should an employer do if he/she refuse to carry out these tasks, on the grounds that they are not described/listed in the contract/role description?
Is the way forward to have an exhaustive list of every conceivable task.leading to perhaps hundreds of pages?
Take for example, someone from the passport office on TV yesterday that said he would not deal with customers at the counter ,if it doesnt say in his contract that he has to deal with customers at the counter,and it doesnt state in his contract "other tasks",then why should he deal with them?( feel free to add your own examples of private sectors doing similar).
If it does state "other tasks" in his contract,then why isnt this person being sacked/disciplined?
Why are employers afraid to take action on contracts which are not being carried out by employees?
Should we put up with a reduced service ( Say its a dry cleaners and you go to the counter to collect your item,but the person refuses to serve at the counter ) because the employer is not prepared to enforce the employees contract?
What message would we send to the employer?
Are employment contracts useless ?
I hope in the examples I have given that I have covered both sectors as I dont want this to be about getting at either sector.