All,
my wife was just informed today (along with all her office colleagues) that the company were closing the Cork office. The reason given was cost of overheads, this section of the business were told they only made modest profit last year and things have not improved or maybe even gotten worse in 2012. However, when the CEO was queried he said that the existing clients and work would be transferred to the dublin office, and that there was an option for a certain function within the office to transfer up. i.e keep your job but move to dublin. We are not in a position to move (kids/school/my work) to Dublin, as is the case for most the group which this offer would apply to. It is likely that they would be hiring new people in the dublin office to cater for this, (i can only presume the new hires are of equivalent experience/level/qualification).
Correct me if i'm wrong but this doesn't sound like a straight forward redundancy case for at least some of the jobs, i.e. the role/work is not being made redundant.
Also, my wife is only with the company for a year so is not entitled to any redundancy.
any advice on the above would be appreciated!
my wife was just informed today (along with all her office colleagues) that the company were closing the Cork office. The reason given was cost of overheads, this section of the business were told they only made modest profit last year and things have not improved or maybe even gotten worse in 2012. However, when the CEO was queried he said that the existing clients and work would be transferred to the dublin office, and that there was an option for a certain function within the office to transfer up. i.e keep your job but move to dublin. We are not in a position to move (kids/school/my work) to Dublin, as is the case for most the group which this offer would apply to. It is likely that they would be hiring new people in the dublin office to cater for this, (i can only presume the new hires are of equivalent experience/level/qualification).
Correct me if i'm wrong but this doesn't sound like a straight forward redundancy case for at least some of the jobs, i.e. the role/work is not being made redundant.
Also, my wife is only with the company for a year so is not entitled to any redundancy.
any advice on the above would be appreciated!