Thank you. In this case, it makes the case to be separately assessed (providing both individuals are higher rate tax payers and there is no advantage to sharing credits etc)."When a married couple opts for joint assessment, they are treated as a *single entity* for tax purposes.
This means that both their incomes are combined, and they benefit from shared tax credits and reliefs.
Filing Requirements
Form 12: This form is typically used by individuals whose main source of income is from PAYE (Pay As You Earn) employment or pensions. If both spouses have unearned income of less than €5,000 each, they can file Form 12 jointly, provided their total unearned income does not exceed €5,000.
Form 11: If their combined unearned income exceeds €5,000, they must file Form 11. This requirement holds even if each spouse's individual unearned income is below the threshold but collectively exceeds €5,000.
Form 11 is required for self-assessment and is necessary for individuals with significant non-PAYE income.
Summary of Conditions
Both Spouses Below €5,000: If each spouse has less than €5,000 in unearned income and their combined total remains below €5,000, they can use Form 12.
Combined Income Exceeds €5,000: If their combined unearned income exceeds €5,000, one or both spouses will need to register with ROS (Revenue Online Service) and complete Form 11."
Did anything come of this? Same situation, form 12 allowed a figure over 5000 to be entered - Jointly assessed. If it is not 5k per person then would you be better off not being jointly assessed?Interestingly, although the above is the official position, form 12 will not block returns with more than €5000 in unearned income. I'm unexpectedly slightly over and waiting to see what happens with my submitted form 12. I'm surprised the limit is not index linked.
@MugsGameYou've underpaid PRSI by at least €200 though (5,000 x 4%) which isn't collected by Form 12. Whether the limit should be higher is irrelevant to that fact.
You’re making an assumption that the OP is liable for PRSI and accordingly has underpaid. There is nothing in the thread to indicate that the OP has such a liability.You've underpaid PRSI by at least €200 though (5,000 x 4%) which isn't collected by Form 12. Whether the limit should be higher is irrelevant to that fact.
Great edit, huge improvement on your previous strawman attack.Since they mentioned working from home it is very likely they are under 70 and are liable for PRSI.
?Great edit, huge improvement on your previous strawman attack.
They may or may not be liable to PRSI. Your statement contains certainty that is inappropriate.
Anyway, Ignore activated.
You are also liable for PRSI on the full amount of unearned income, which Form 12 users are exempt from.
Why not try to contact them to correct what you think is incorrect? I would but I don't know what the issue is here...If this is the best effort by Citizens Advice to decipher our ultra complicated Prsi system, it is totally unreasonable to expect the ordinary citizen to figure it out.
Why not try to contact them to correct what you think is incorrect? I would but I don't know what the issue is here...
It doesn't say if you pay class K contributions you are entitled to no benefits. It says you aren't entitled to any benefits from those class K contributions.Reading this a person would conclude that any person with unearned income will be liable to Prsi class K and receive no benefits.
The key word here is only.employed contributors and occupational pensioners whose only additional income is unearned may be liable for PRSI contributions on this income.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?