More or less.........
Not sure if it applies to motor insurance but it always did to property (real estate) insurance, not 100% sure if it does anymore. So if for example you insure a house for 300K and its real rebuild costs are 400k and that property is razed to the ground, then the underwriters may say that seeing as you under insured the property by 25% then the max they will pay is 300K lest 25% ie. 225K.
So why do we go through this charade of "What is the valuation of your car" when buying insurance? Why not let the insurance company tell us what the car is worth, because if the worst happens the will only pay out their own valuation anyway.At least then no-one is under or over insuring their car
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?