3littlefish
Registered User
- Messages
- 43
Who knows. More cooperation between the tax authorities across the EU/euro zone in the future might not be that unlikely and then such evasion could come to light. Revenue have all the time in the world to catch up with past indiscretions...If property or land was purchased abroad without the knowledge of the Revenue does it always have to stay that way?
Without doubt, if people are purchasing them by means of undeclared funds...In the years to come, are we likely to see a property version of the Bogus Non Resident Off Shore accounts scandal?
Without doubt, if people are purchasing them by means of undeclared funds...
I wouldn't be surprised if there are a lot of individuals who have undeclared funds. Undeclared funds not only include proceeds from crime but might be undeclared inheritances of overseas properties from family members, bogus non-resident accounts that were used to purchase overseas property...I doubt people (excluding drug money etc) are buying property overseas with undeclared funds.
Yup, probably a more common reason alright... though the undeclared funds type of investigation might yield more cash to the Revenue.Or not declaring rental income or capital gains?
I wouldn't be surprised if there are a lot of individuals who have undeclared funds. Undeclared funds not only include proceeds from crime but might be undeclared inheritances of overseas properties from family members, bogus non-resident accounts that were used to purchase overseas property...
I wouldn't be surprised if there are a lot of individuals who have undeclared funds. Undeclared funds not only include proceeds from crime but might be undeclared inheritances of overseas properties from family members, bogus non-resident accounts that were used to purchase overseas property...
So if i don't think that 41% is a fair share to be paying the governement i shouldn't declare my income?Could be, but less likely since CGT was halved.
Let's face it, 20% is a fair share...40% is not.
So if i don't think that 41% is a fair share to be paying the governement i shouldn't declare my income?
In any event declaring a gain now that was liable to a rate of 40% in the past is liable to a gain at 40% (as that was the rate that applied at the time).
And vice versa I would say! A bit of chicken and egg involved.The high taxation regime of the 70's and 80's contributed to the corruption and tax evasion of the period.
But surely any future DTA could have an impact?Well the easiest route to avoid the Revenue finding out on a foreign property is to purchase in a country where we do not have a double tax agreement with.
That applies even buying in Ireland in spite of seemingly many people assuming that the following formula applies: mortgage repayments > rental income = no tax!don't forget you could be making taxable profits but not positive cashflow so having to pay tax twice is a bit bitter when you don't have the readies
And vice versa I would say! A bit of chicken and egg involved.
Does DTA also = lets keep each other informed about ownership of property by non residents??????
A 70% top rate of tax does not necessarily mean that you actually pay that amount on gross income. Just as a 42% (2006) top rate does not mean that you actually pay that amount on gross income!Fair point...though I could imagine at least listening to somebody justifying dodging a 70% rate of tax..
A 70% top rate of tax does not necessarily mean that you actually pay that amount on gross income. Just as a 42% (2006) top rate does not mean that you actually pay that amount on gross income!
What was your effective tax/PRSI take in 2006?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?