No, it's a bit different. Yes, the loan balances are a lot bigger, but the percentage over charged is smaller, and the term shorter.Its potentially more costly to the banks than the tracker mortgage scandal because of the vast sums involved
No, it's a bit different. Yes, the loan balances are a lot bigger, but the percentage over charged is smaller, and the term shorter.
In the cases of non performing loans, there's no real cost to the bank, as the amount they expect to get back doesn't change.
UB have already made a provision for it which will give you an idea of the amount involved.
What makes it complicated is a large portion of the impacted loans were sold.
Then they'll have to redress, in exactly the same manner....What happens if the other financial institutions were at the same?
Then they'll have to redress, in exactly the same manner....