D
Both the company im in now and the new company are in the same place.
my current employer isnt offering redundancy, is this wrong?
If you are not satisfied with your rep's response take it to the next level, contact the paid Union employee who deals with your area.Thanks aj,
ye we're in a trade union but our representative is not very good at giving us information
Consultation
The Employees (Provision of Information and Consultation) Act 2006 (pdf) provides a general right to information and consultation for employees from their employer on matters which directly affect them. The legislation requires employers to inform and consult employees on any decisions likely to lead to substantial changes in work organisation or contractual relations – with particular reference to mergers and acquisitions and to collective redundancies. This means that employers are required to consult with employees before major decisions are made, including transfer of business. Since 23 March 2008 it applies to employers with at least 50 employees.
Under the European Communities (Protection of Employees on Transfer of Undertakings) Regulations 2003 employees (including those who are not covered by the Act as they are working for an employer with fewer than 50 employees) must be given details of the transfer as follows:
The employer must also consult with the employees’ union or, in the absence of a union, with the chosen representative(s) of the employees.
- If the employees are in a union, not later than 30 days before the transfer, the employer must provide the union with details of the reasons for the transfer; the date or proposed date of the transfer; and the legal, economic and social implications for the employees
- If the employees are not in a union, the employer must give the details already mentioned in writing to each employee not later than 30 days before the transfer
This would be the usual practice. Indeed if you had to move then this would be a variation of your TandC's. In the circumstances where you were physically moving from one site to another it would be up to the old company to arrange the move before the new company bought the old company / section of the old company.
The old company must pay statutory redundancy if it is letting go employees. In some cases the old company will negotiate somewhat better terms for employees who are leaving to ease the sale of the company.
I must state here that my experience with TUPE is somewhat dated and related to traditional industries. I am aware that certain parts of the financial services industry and the IT industries are pushing the envelope out in terms of how the TUPE legislation is interpreted and applied. Generally in the past and in the traditional industries TUPE genuinely protected the employee but I note a tone of dread among employees in the new technology sectors who are facing being TUPEd.
Hello, responding to this thread many years later from the original posts! Not involved in TUPE yet but could very well be in the near futureThis would be the usual practice. Indeed if you had to move then this would be a variation of your TandC's. In the circumstances where you were physically moving from one site to another it would be up to the old company to arrange the move before the new company bought the old company / section of the old company.
The old company must pay statutory redundancy if it is letting go employees. In some cases the old company will negotiate somewhat better terms for employees who are leaving to ease the sale of the company.
I must state here that my experience with TUPE is somewhat dated and related to traditional industries. I am aware that certain parts of the financial services industry and the IT industries are pushing the envelope out in terms of how the TUPE legislation is interpreted and applied. Generally in the past and in the traditional industries TUPE genuinely protected the employee but I note a tone of dread among employees in the new technology sectors who are facing being TUPEd.
Thanks Clamball - good to hear that. It would be a portion (only a Dept) of the company so I think that they would have to adhere to the "overall" - existing scheme? Thanks for the reply....If you decline to move to the new company and are offered redundancy by your current company they may face a lot of scrutiny if they don’t offer you the current redundancy scheme. They can of course shut the current redundancy scheme and start offering the tupe movers a lesser package until the move has taken place.
Ok thanks Peanuts....I thought that was the case originally and then thought I saw on one of the posts that Statutory Redundancy might apply - OK so nothing at all if you refuse to move? ; or discretionary depending on employer? thanks againFor clarity, if TUPE applies and you refuse to move, you are deemed to have resigned and your employer has no obligations towards you for any redundancy package. That has been confirmed in the WRC and the Labour Court many years ago.
Not all of your T&C's transfer over if you do move, Pensions being a case in point.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?