Gordon Gekko
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,843
I would share your suspicion.
Just to further complicate things, would any Revenue settlement discharged by PTSB on behalf of those concerned not itself be treated as a taxable benefit (a gift?) to those individual borrowers if it is not deducted from the compensation payments made by PTSB (which payments may also be taxable IMO)?
Yes, but not a gift. My sense is that the tax relief will have to be clawed back. Customers have obtained relief on interest that they didn't pay. But if Permo pay Revenue (i.e. take the hit), my view is that it will be a tax nothing and that Revenue will confirm this by way of an eBrief.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
It might serve to confuse posters entitled to settlements.
Let's first see whether or not settlements are reduced by excess TRS.
You may well be right but the legislative basis for this is not immediately obvious to me - powerful and all as they are, Revenue can't legislate by eBrief!
In any event, if PTSB was to gross up the compensation package to include the excess TRS payments - and no further tax was payable in this regard by the relevant borrowers - well, that would be a pretty sweet deal. Not sure how I feel about that as a taxpayer/PTSB shareholder but this is going to be such a mess to resolve this is probably a minor detail in the grand scheme of things.
Hi Juno
I don't. It's very unsatisfactory that they don't issue a public statement on it.
Brendan
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?