Your link says "The owner of a tree which is a danger to the occupiers of adjoining land, or to people lawfully using a public way, is liable for any damage that it causes providing that negligence is proved against the owner. Owners should inspect their trees regularly, calling in professionals if necessary."In the absence of documented, regular, inspections, the owner of the tree is liableFor them to have liability, you will need to prove they were aware the tree was posing a danger.
I don’t know who was responsible for the tree. Was driving home from work and it fell from the side of the road on my car. Where can I find out who was responsible??
In the absence of documented, regular, inspections, the owner of the tree is liable
Would a falling tree not be considered as "an act of God" in Insurance terminology and not covered by insurance at all.
Would a falling tree not be considered as "an act of God" in Insurance terminology and not covered by insurance at all.
Would a falling tree not be considered as "an act of God" in Insurance terminology and not covered by insurance at all.
I would have thought if the OP had fully comprehensive insurance the cost of repairs to the car would be covered. If a neighbour's tree falls on your house it's your own house insurance that you claim on, unless you can prove that the neighbour was negligent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?