I have to come clean.I have rummaged through my documents saved away down the years and ,to my surprise ,I have come up with most of the answer to my question in that the BoiLife people did in fact send me out a resume of how my investment was performing (they weren't sending out statements on a regular basis so I did have to ask for this informationat the time but it is pretty complete)
I have a breakdown , in 2008 of the then current geographical (very wide)and asset (equities @74% of total) split.
I apologise for not doing this rummage previously but I had practically grown myself a "false memory" in that I had of course seen those documents at the time but had not taken them in correctly but carried on since assuming that it was mostly Iseq based equities I was involved with.
I assume I would be right about that ? If the equities are spread geographically to include ,say, Pac Basin equities along with Jap, N.American ,Irish , et al etc etc does that mean that the ISEQ is a pretty poor measure of how my fund is and has been performing?
Or maybe those "foreign" equities would still have to be listed on the Irish Stock Exchange in which case the Iseq would seem to be a much closer measure? (I am ignorant on that question although I would lean to the former explanation)
ps I can't have been that paranoid after all if that information I just recovered was so easily let lie....