Both sets of conflicting advice appear to be wrong.
The old rule of thumb 1 day per 1 mm is not a million miles out.
Four weeks = 4 X 7 = 28 days/mm might do for a 30mm screed - who uses these?
so for a three inch topping screed this would average 75 days/ 9weeks/ over two months
You should at least double that for a six inch (150mm) slab, but these are only ball park estimates.
I've certainly known of slabs taking
far longer to dry out - up to and including the 6 months hastalavista was talking about - because of:
(i) the additional thickness for something that dries out from the top down
(ii) poor weathering protection during the build
(iii) moist/damp local conditions
Tiling the slab to early will tend to seal the excess moisture in
You should read
this guide by Weber to get a better understanding of the issues involved.
Builders who suggest tiling in two weeks are suiting themselves and walking away from problems.
Ask the guys who gave you that estimate what kind of follow up service they provide and ring around their "satisfied clients".
Concrete has issues in terms of its surface finish affecting the applied finish and others in relation to setting and shrinking.
This
online guide from BASF gives an indication of some the issues arising.
There are advance moisture testing procedures if you want to be certain.
Moisture probes and tests which rely on surface testing are generally not that accurate.
Changes which have arisen in recent years are generally only becoming well understood now.
[broken link removed] summarizes several forms of test and ASTMF 2170 seems to be setting the standard.
The reason for this seems to be that surface tests can be wildly inaccurate, while testing the actual moisture deep in the slab offers more surety.
There are no conflicts here.
If in doubt use the longer time period.
I am not an expert in the field of slab or screed testing.
Many in the industry don't understand the limitations of wet trades.
But tilers and adhesive manufacturers are sometimes only telling you what you want to hear.
FWIW
ONQ.
[broken link removed]
All advice on AAM is remote from the situation and cannot be relied upon as a defence or support - in and of itself - should legal action be taken.
Competent legal and building professionals should be asked to advise in Real Life with rights to inspect and issue reports on the matters at hand.