Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,770
If TM want is to commit a number of hours to being on hold, on their dodgy website,
There is nothing dodgy about it.
If 500,000 people join a queue for 150,000 tickets, it will take hours to process.
When you get on, you are usually given some minutes to complete the transaction.
Brendan
I disagree about how long the transactions should take to process
Hello,
I was wondering, has anyone ever tried making a complaint about Ticketmaster, on anti-competitive grounds?
While, in theory, there is competition in the marketplace, in reality, they have a defacto monopoly.
By extension, they charge what they want on fees, with no competitive pressure to keep fees reasonable, and their service is dreadful.
Is this one for the Competition Authority (CCPC ?) or have people previously tried and got nowhere?
They had free choice whether to pay the price or not. Clearly people have that sort of money to pay otherwise the tickets wouldn't have sold out so fast.The dynamic pricing piece, whilst very irritating, is genius. I have two friends who paid €1,200 for two normal standing tickets (insane).
That would be my take also. They quite happily paid €400 per tct, I really don't know what all the fuss is about.I wanted to fly to Birmingham last week at short notice. The flights were €325. I chose not to go.
If you don't want to pay €1,000 to see Oasis, then don't. Let someone else who wants to pay that price go.
I am not a fan but if I had got tickets at €20 each, I would probably have gone to see what all the fuss was about thus depriving a real fan.
but they all paid £6.50. Some better seats were probably a bit higher.A former MD of Ticketmaster says it's better now than in the old days
Oasis tickets controversy: ‘People say it was better in the old days. It really wasn’t’
Amid calls for Ticketmaster’s ‘dynamic pricing’ to be investigated, the company’s former MD says it is not a monopoly and will remain popularwww.irishtimes.com
It was different in his early days. He sold £6.50 tickets to 700 people who went to see Oasis in the Tivoli in 1994 and recalls how a couple of years later there were thousands of people on Grafton Street queuing for tickets to see the band in the old Point Depot. “People say it was better in the old days. It really wasn’t. At least now I can sit in my bed on my computer queuing for tickets,” he said.
It still undermines your suggestion that endemic industry greed can be cured by government action.That doesn't excuse the industry, in any shape or form, as I'd hope you will agree.
Livenation/Ticketmaster/MCD are one and the same: they book the acts, promote the events, sell the tickets - there are definitely competition issues at play.
Venues are also tied into this monopoly. They are threatened with being blacklisted from all future events if they sway from ticketmaster/live nationThis is certainly something which could be looked at.
MCD is not going to go to another ticket seller if its parent owns Ticketmaster. If Livenation promotes a tour it's going to use MCD and Ticketmaster.
But presumably Oasis could have used some other promoter and ticket distributor?
Venues are also tied into this monopoly. They are threatened with being blacklisted from all future events if they sway from ticketmaster/live nation
They're currently being investigated in America for itWhere is your evidence for this? If you have it, you should certainly let the CCPC know as I assume that would be abuse of a dominant position.
I disagreeIt still undermines your suggestion that endemic industry greed can be cured by government action.
Not at all.Oasis are washing their hands of it.
Oasis said the decision to go for dynamic pricing was made by the promoter, Ticketmaster and the band’s management
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?