beattie said:Will the appreciating euro have any knock on effects in industries whereby we are already feeling the pinch. If the Fed is close to calling a halt and the ECB soon to increase I think we could see $1.30 sooner than what many would have expected
http://www.rte.ie/business/2006/0425/germany.html
And anyone who supplies US multinationals (or works for them) will suffer since they cost everything in dollars.Exports, to america, will suffer but if that's not your market then it's actually beneficial
joe sod said:"Re the Symantec tax isssue, there is a strong possbility they will beat the IRS claim, or if not beat it at least substantially reduce the liability to a a few hundred million. The IRS are basically chancing their arm on this, in the hope that they will get something out of it, or at worst scare a few firms into recognising more taxable revenue in the states. If a transfer price can be shown to be economically justifiable there should be very little they can do."
Im not so sure, i think there is a big change of sentiment by the IRS. The american government needs alot more money to support its spending. Also what Symantec is at is really hurting the american balance of payments. Effectively it is licensing an irish subsidiary to sell american technology in europe as if it were an irish export but the actual technology is developed by its american operation. So basically other countries like ireland and china etc are reaping the benefits by boosting their own balance of payments and government revenue. So I think in future the IRS is going to make it very difficult for multinationals to continue this practice.
The problem is that the IRS will have to prove that the initial transfers were at levels which would indicate that the transactions were not at arms length, this will be difficult to prove because it is subjective, in addition, one imagines that Symantec had and will continue to have the benefit of top notch legal advice on their transfer pricing structure. I agree that this is something the US are trying to clamp down on, but in my opinion that will require new legislation (presuming that Symantec did indeed have expert advice initially), for me this is more like a warning shot across the bows, Symantec will pay a few hundred and all parties will be satisfied. Maybe the simplest way forward is for the US to reduce CT rates??Effectively it is licensing an irish subsidiary to sell american technology in europe as if it were an irish export but the actual technology is developed by its american operation. So basically other countries like ireland and china etc are reaping the benefits by boosting their own balance of payments and government revenue.
beattie said:any sensible government would do something about it .....
ubiquitous said:any suggestions?
Scrap stamp duty on houses. It may drive up ASKING prices but should increase supplyubiquitous said:any suggestions?
This post will be deleted if not edited immediately H.. that would make things worse. Do you not remember what happened when the FTB stamp duty reductions came in..? Every shed in dublin overnight shot up to 317k.redo said:Scrap stamp duty on houses. It may drive up ASKING prices but should increase supply
I think they are just hoping it all holds together until after the elections in 2007 then they may do something about it. If it crashes before then they are fecked and they know it.soma said:However any of these measures are extremely unlikely to happen as the government would be slaughtered in the next election if they did this.
whizzbang said:I think they are just hoping it all holds together until after the elections in 2007 then they may do something about it. If it crashes before then they are fecked and they know it.
Howitzer said:Why would they be fecked? The govt, in reality, has little or no influence on what investments people make in their private lives. I stubbed my toe on the bed post this morning, I didn't blame Bertie for my own carelessness.
It would be an incredibly childish attitude for someone who enters into a very serious financial arrangement to then blame the govt for their own fiscal ineptitude if things went wrong.
whizzbang said:I think if people get into serious negative equity they will look for someone to blame. People will say the governement shuld have prevented the crash happening or they will blame something the government did for causing the crash.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?