Any sector open to real competition looks to take cost out of the process. The construction sector looks for hand-outs.
The State is the biggest single purchaser and developer in the country. Where is the plan to bulk buy modular homes to be constructed on State land, thus circumventing many of the supply side constraints, kick starting a more efficient supply chain and shortening the construction cycle. The gross inefficiency of the State is matched by the gross inefficiency of the construction sector itself.
I'm not sure how many salary men on this board would so myopic and blinkered that they wouldn't see that the solution to so much of the problem was within their control if they were looking at becoming a developer.
So much of this comes down to one simple thing, for everyone in the long process involved in delivering homes; stop whining and just do your job properly.
Read .Your right of course - developers just sit around together trying to figure out handout schemes…..and not one of them has said to themselves ever hey I can be the Michael O’leary/Ryanair of this lot of tossers and crush all these lazy handout loving developers by increasing efficiency and taking out costs and making a fortune for myself? Nope no real entrepreneur, in the most entrepreneurial of sectors, has ever thought of what you’ve suggested.
Likewise international capital markets are completely dumb………as they assign Ireland‘s publicly listed home builders Cairn Homes / Glenveagh effectively liquidation values to their businesses….Glenveagh trades regularly below the cost of the money they spent on acquiring land…….dont these asset managers/hedge fund managers/pension funds realize these business are directly plugged into handout gravy train?
Yeah Irish property developers have never heard of any of that you should email them the reportRead .
This is the first point in their Summery;
Globally, construction sector labor-productivity growth averaged 1 percent a year over the past two decades, compared with 2.8 percent for the total world economy and 3.6 percent for manufacturing. In a sample of countries analyzed, less than 25 percent of construction firms matched the productivity growth achieved in the overall economies where they work over the past decade. Absent change, global need for infrastructure and housing will be hard to meet. If construction productivity were to catch up with the total economy, the industry’s value added could rise by $1.6 trillion a year. That would meet about half of the world’s annual infrastructure needs or boost global GDP by 2 percent. One third of the opportunity is in the United States, where, since 1945, productivity in manufacturing, retail, and agriculture has grown by as much as 1,500 percent, but productivity in construction has barely increased at all.
Being a chancer doesn't make you an entrepreneur. Calling construction entrepreneurial is a joke. Entrepreneurs disrupt the market, they innovate, they change. Developers are more like gamblers.
It is an industry dominated by risk, where hubris and stuffed brown envelopes masquerade as intellect and competence.
Being plugged into tax payer funded life support doesn't make for an attractive investment opportunity.
Why has productivity in construction lagged so far behind just about every other form of manufacturing?
Here's the second point of McKinsey's report;
Examples of innovative firms and regions suggest that acting in seven areas simultaneously could boost productivity by 50 to 60 percent. They are: reshape regulation; rewire the contractual framework to reshape industry dynamics; rethink design and engineering processes; improve procurement and supply-chain management; improve on-site execution; infuse digital technology, new materials, and advanced automation; and reskill the workforce. Parts of the industry could move toward a manufacturing-inspired mass-production system that would boost productivity up to tenfold. Industrial and infrastructure megaprojects need to instill holistic project-operating systems on-site and in design offices. The highly non-linear and challenging nature of megaprojects underscores the difficulty of, and necessity for, moving toward an industrialized project-operating system (my Bold)
So there's one or two builders trying to do it right, but given that their own labour costs are increasing they are failing.Yeah Irish property developers have never heard of any of that you should email them the report
Creating A Connected Experience for the Expansion of Copenhagen's Metro with Autodesk Build
Copenhagen Metro is standardising and digitalising their construction processes with Autodesk Build within Autodesk Construction Cloud™construction.autodesk.com
[broken link removed]
Btw Glenveagh subsequently bought the quarry and vertically integrated the processGlenveagh and Panda among firms eyeing €3.5m quarry as bid deadline looms
Glenveagh Properties and Panda Waste are among a number of parties who have expressed interest in buying a West Dublin quarry with a guide price of €3.5m.m.independent.ie
Glenveagh run their whole business infrastructure in the cloud.
Biometrics measure contractors coming on site and benchmark time to complete tasks across 17 different sites for contractor efficiency measurement.
Advanced drones measure the site topography with lidar and laser tech.
They contract labor on multi-year contracts.
They introduced virtual reality viewings during the pandemic.
Self guided viewings we’re introduced where the front door lock could be unlocked remotely and viewers greeted by a person remote beamed in on the TV in the living room
They buy building materials in bulk and have standardized their home product such that they have limited material SKU’s and can deliver where possible modular solutions
what else would you like them to do?
Oh and through all those jiggs and reels the stock market looks at the economics of being a technological advanced scale home builder in Ireland & says…..no thanks…..we’re going to value your company for no more than the money you spent on the land you hold and not a cent more than that. If it was such a great business to be in the profit truffle hounds that are the capital markets would have found Cairn & Glenveagh and gave them a valuation more than their liquidation value.
I've worked in manufacturing for 30 years and have seen the move from manual to automated manufacturing. It is painful and difficult and only happens when there is no alternative.I think you have utopian vision of what technology is capable of doing - the easy stuff has been done………..like moving retail commerce inventory from a physical store to an online catalogue. Delivering banking services online. Repetitive simple tasks done by people on production lines another. It may have taken time to get where we are today but in the future we’ll look back at what was solved in the last twenty years by technology as kind of the easy peazy stuff.
What remains for technology to disrupt are the really really complex problems and they are the ones that must exist & remain in the world of atoms not bits (construction, medical, farming, transportation).
I think your underestimating the complexity of the problems left to solve by software & automation. I note that Mr.Tech Utopian man himself Elon Musk pulled back very severely how much he thought could be automated in the production of Tesla cars……saying something to the effect that he’d completely overestimated robotics capability to do complex tasks and completely underestimated the complexity of tasks humans in the real world perform. Note this today on Elon/Tesla's issues scaling solar roof - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...st-and-a-fixation-for-elon-musk?sref=7zqHEcxJ ..........the real real world outside of factories/the internet is complex, variable & unpredictable. Progress here is slow and incremental.
No, I'm basing it on the factors that were outlined in the report I lined to.I’m also gleaning ,from your comments, that you attribute the slowness of automation and technological adoption in said industries to a somewhat conspiratorial cartel of “insiders” in those industries who are protected somehow by the status quo.
So have I.I’m always wary when I hear such thoughts.
Fair enough.Btw I’m also gleaning that you think I’m a construction industry shill (sticking inside the theme of your conspiratorial thinking). I dont,
So what's your opinion on the report?I work in finance and have studied the construction industry in Ireland/abroad.
There's plenty of competition on the finance side but they are all chasing the pool of actual builders. That means they can pick and choose and there is even less incentive for the building sector to become more efficient. International traffic is coming here because they are chasing higher returns due to the shortcomings of the system that delivers housing. That goes from Department of the Environment, the Courts and planning appeals process and the construction sector itself. The fact that developers can sit on massive land banks for so long, and it takes so long to develop them when they do get moving, shows how rotten the whole thing is.In terms of not open to real global competition in the construction sector in Ireland - think your ill informed about the constituency & origin of the developers currently operating in Ireland.…...…
- Cairn Homes was setup and has its origins as a UK hedge fund & asset management backed startup to develope c.2,000 homes year….they’ve a land bank of ~17,000
- Glenveagh properties was established by Oaktree Capital a New York based asset manager that IPO’d it In 2018 - their land bank is ~18,000
- Lone Star, a Texas based private equity fund, has created a developer Quiatian / DRes to deliver home on its c.9,000 home landbank
- Balfour Beaty is UK contract construction provider here - that is delivering big public procurement led construction
AND thats without mentioning that the money men & capital thats forward funding much of what the construction industry in Ireland is delivering on the commercial & apartment side is backed by foreign capital. You think the folks in London and New York who have options on where to deploy their capital into construction projects are allowing Ireland’s lazy/stupid/inefficient developers to deliver a product that doesn’t benchmark well against construction projects in other countries . Dont think so.
Plenty of international participation and traffic coming through Ireland - it is after all by most measures one of the most open economies in the world.
So what's your opinion on the report?
Ah, okay. 'nuff said.My opinion is its not a report, it's a McKinsey & Co. advertising brochure
reading your posts I can't stop thinking of the Grenfell towers mess and the prefabricated hostel's mess in direct provisions, the quick manufacturingAh, okay. 'nuff said.
(pre-fabs). Proper regulations are all that is needed to ensure quality.reading your posts I can't stop thinking of the Grenfell towers mess and the prefabricated hostel's mess in direct provisions, the quick manufacturing
won the argument,
I looked at pre-manufacturing units some years ago l come from an engineering background I can tell you it's not like it says on the tin,
new House prices in Sweden increased on average by15% in the last year, they are predicted to go up by a larger % this year, if you check it out most is driven by regulations and Government policy,(pre-fabs). Proper regulations are all that is needed to ensure quality.
A big part of the problem in this country is the lack of skills, competence and work ethic within the department of the environment housing enforcement division.
The State is certainly a major factor, possibly the biggest factor in house price inflation. My comments on the construction sector relate specifically to the hard construction itself and the related supply chain though their inefficiency has a knock on impact on the total cost of financing.new House prices in Sweden increased on average by15% in the last year, they are predicted to go up by a larger % this year, if you check it out most is driven by regulations and Government policy,
A little research and you can see all is not as it seems,
One theme running through the blog was the industry’s resistance to adopting new technologies. I think that the educational levels and general intelligence of a good proportion of the people working on building sites is a major factor in why that is the case, particularly in this country. That’s a reflection of our broader educational snobbery.
Tell them they are doing something wrong the Irish went all over the world with little or no education and excelled they are talking muck,it’s an amazing thing when I have senior guys working with me asking that we don’t hire Irish trades people because the Eastern European guys are smarter and better trained
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?