G
Is there any website showing the actual results in each constituency i.e. the number of votes cast for/against? Most of the news sites I've looked at seem to have just textual reports giving rough percentages for some constituencues.
It's all over, the final tally from the taoiseach's constituency has come in.
Over 100,000 votes more voted 'No'.
The EU that has had us in good stead for the last 35 years is to remain as is.
Phew!
They used to have a system like that in the North. It was not popular with some.
Personally I'm a democrat and don't see a link between what people earn and their value as people.
And well she may be happy. This now gives the French a clear run to harmonise the CT rate, a real sore point with them. Why do you think that French guy made such a crass intervention into the referendum?Have just received an email from a French customer thanking the people of Ireland for a no vote...
This vote is a disgrace. There are plenty of valid reasons for voting yes or no but to think that this failed essentially because of the 'I don't understand so I'll vote no' brigade.
This vote is a disgrace. There are plenty of valid reasons for voting yes or no but to think that this failed essentially because of the 'I don't understand so I'll vote no' brigade. If one more person said 'It just hasn't been explained to us properly' to me over the last few days I'd have strangled them. Fair enough if the information was unclear or just not there but you ask the same people have they read the literature, the papers or looked at the website - absolutely not - sure why would they waste their time when they could just be safe and vote no.
As Monty Python would say, what did Europe ever do for us anyway?
I asked you what percentage increase you on your hypothetical 40k/year with 2 kids is willing to pay. Can't you answer that question?What I would be willing to pay and what a guy with two kids earning 40000 a year should pay are very different.
its offical now,the no vote have it......happy days
While I do see the Mrs. Doyle in asking the same question, sometimes it is the right thing to do. It depends on why people rejected Lisbon. Did people reject Lisbon because they soberly and dispassionately saw it as not only of no benefit but of actual detriment to us? I sincerly doubt it, I think many voted no due to uncertainty, some due to misinformation, some due to fear, some due to disaffection with the government. In which case should their first no be the only chance they have to answer?That would involve a second referendum. Sure then they wouldn't be respecting the wishes of the Irish electorate, that's what they did with Nice, they'll keep asking us till they get the right answer, blah, blah, blah.
While I do see the Mrs. Doyle in asking the same question, sometimes it is the right thing to do. It depends on why people rejected Lisbon. Did people reject Lisbon because they soberly and dispassionately saw it as not only of no benefit but of actual detriment to us? I sincerly doubt it, I think many voted no due to uncertainty, some due to misinformation, some due to fear, some due to disaffection with the government. In which case should their first no be the only chance they have to answer?
What makes you think it failed on this?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?