tax office error

J

Johnboy45

Registered User
Messages
96
if the tax office has made an error in the allocation of tax credits and this only comes to light after 2 years, am I really responsible to pay it back at stage?
 
Yes. It's up to you to keep your tax affairs in order and to check for such errors.
 
If the amount is matieral, you could ask that it be taken by deduction from future tax credits over a couple of years. They will usually accede to this.
 
thanks Clubman and Graham. its not my actual problem thank god, heard someone on the bus this morning talking about it and wondered what the situation was. I did think it would be up to the individual to check credits/allowances but wasn't 100% sure. I've just checked my credit certificate and it does state ...

“Your employer will deduct tax using this information so please ensure that it is up to date and accurate.”


 
And they can go back a lot further than 2 years if necessary. Even though taxpayers can only backdate claims by 4 years...
 
They went back 15 years with me, it was added to my yearly return last year, but fortunately I still had all of the documentation and they did not, so they could not tell me what it was for. By the way you can only claim back up to 6 years from the tax office
 
I tried to make a case with the local TD on this one, he told me 6 years, I may be wrong, but is does seem a very one sided system when the tax office can go back as far as they like
 
Yes, four years and I think it is inherently unfair that they can set a limit of four years and yet go back as long as they like. I think there is a case for challenge in some of their behaviour; however small tax payers have no chance. It will be interesting to see if the relatives of deceased who were not compliant and whose dead relatives estates were pursued for interest and penalties will take a case, now that Revenue have dropped this policy.
If my memory is correct , at one stage one could claim back ten years and then it became six years and now its four years, all that is fine if they operated the same policy.. I am a PAYE worker who is not evading tax, that is to my knowledge but from what I know it is mainly small tax payers who forget to claim or are careless in claiming medical expenses and many other allowances where the more affluent employ accountants to do the necessary and are unlikely to lose out.
 
Brianne said:
the more affluent employ accountants to do the necessary
Click to expand...

A PAYE worker does not have to be particularly affluent to be able to afford the cost of an accountant to examine their annual P60, and entitlement to tax credits, allowances etc. Anyone earning the average industrial wage should be able to get such service for the equivalent of about 1-2 days pay, ie €250-€300 and possibly a good bit cheaper.

Declaration of interest: I am an accountant.
 
Agreed , that figure is not a whole lot .However, the truth is that many PAYE workers are not that well informed and don't either claim themselves or get an accountant to do it. I recently came across a neighbour who had experienced a lot of illness with children over the past few years, she honestly didn't know about claiming back for the costs. She didn't believe me when I told her.Luckily , her GP was able to provide records and she got back a tidy sum, but only for the four years. I'm talking about someone who would have been at the GP with children an average of thirty times yearly........big money. Ok , ignorance of the law is, I suppose, no excuse, but when you see the way big business are able to come to settlements, and then you see someone with average wages,and in this case, one income and no nixers, I think the system is unfair.
 
In most cases I doubt that PAYE workers need an accountant anyway (unless they have other non PAYE income and/or non PAYE income tax liabilities). A relatively basic understanding of how the tax system works and a review of your statement of tax credits, payslips, P60s etc. is all that is needed. But many people can't be bothered and prefer to blame somebody else if/when discrepancies arise that lead to them owing back tax or treat unsolicited refunds of tax as some sort of magical Revenue lottery win.
 
Brianne said:
when you see the way big business are able to come to settlements, ... I think the system is unfair.
Click to expand...

With respect, I suspect that you have absolutely no knowledge of how the Revenue Audit system operates in relation to so-called tax settlements. Otherwise you would not write something as ill-informed as the above. A tax settlement does not denote a discount of any kind to the taxpayer, but in fact in the vast majority of cases involves the imposition of punitive penalties and 10%-12% per annum interest in addition to the core tax liability of the defaulter. The penalties alone can represent up to an extra 100% of the tax liability and are applied even in cases where Revenue fully accept and agree that the tax default arose due to a genuine error on the part of the taxpayer (big business, small business or individual) in the first instance.
 
ClubMan said:
In most cases I doubt that PAYE workers need an accountant anyway (unless they have other non PAYE income and/or non PAYE income tax liabilities). A relatively basic understanding of how the tax system works and a review of your statement of tax credits, payslips, P60s etc. is all that is needed. But many people can't be bothered and prefer to blame somebody else if/when discrepancies arise that lead to them owing back tax or treat unsolicited refunds of tax as some sort of magical Revenue lottery win.
Click to expand...

I agree fully. My point above was not a pitch advocating that PAYE taxpayers should start queueing outside their local accountants offices (God knows we have enough to be doing as it is) but was merely to counter the nonsense that only "the more affluent employ accountants to do the necessary" as if this was something underhand or criminal :confused:
 
Ubiquitous, please quote me correctly. I didn't say that ONLY the affluent employ accountants. By inserting ONLY , you have completely changed the meaning. Furthermore, any inference re wrong doing or criiminality is your own. My meaning is that an accountant would know the tax law, and thus would not make the errors that someone ignorant of same would make.
I am not in the habit of inferring anything and if for some reason, you feel defensive , that is not of my making . I would expect an accountant to be more versed in tax law than a layperson, as I would expect a doctor to know more about medicine than a first aider.
Maybe I am ignorant of how Revenue Audits work but I can read and watch television.
I read the papers, I see the penalties imposed , I'm sure you as the professional are quite correct in your analysis of same, for the majority ; however , please don't tell me that Revenue don't and haven't in the past made settlements.........but no way will they settle with the person who misses out on a few hundred euros, said person genuinely not having a basic knowledge of the tax law. Remember, many people aren't very literate and not well paid, I know many, and no, they don't employ accountants.
http://www.rte.ie/news/2006/0323/moriarty.html
 
I am a PAYE worker but because I own a few share (not a lot) I have an accountant, this cost me a few hundred Euro a year which I cannot claim back tax on. ( if I was in business or self employed I could). As previously stated the Tax office went back 15 years with me, even though I had an accountant and had a refund the year in question.
It worries me now that as I am aproaching retirement with limited funds that I may receive another bill going back a few years.

I think we should all make a case to our TDs about the out of balance system of claiming back 4 years for us and the Tax office can go back as far as they like
 
A relatively basic understanding of how the tax system works and a review of your statement of tax credits, payslips, P60s etc. is all that is needed. But many people can't be bothered and prefer to blame somebody else if/when discrepancies arise that lead to them owing back tax or treat unsolicited refunds of tax as some sort of magical Revenue lottery win.
Click to expand...
Many (most?) people do not know how the tax system works. Even fewer know how PRSI operates, judging by recent threads on AAM. They are at the mercy of the revenue.
Try explaining to someone with very basic literacy how cumulative PAYE tax works. It's not that they can't be bothered. Every penny counts, especially if they are on low income.
If a system doesn't work, the users shouldn't be blamed.
 
but no way will they settle with the person who misses out on a few hundred euros,
Click to expand...
Have you any evidence to back up this assertion? I don't believe it is correct. For example, previous AAM threads have discussed the current Revenue practice to sometimes indicate on PAYE Balancing Statements that minor PAYE balances owed to by the taxpayer "will not be collected at this time".


ps I did most definitely not misquote you. You say "I didn't say that ONLY the affluent employ accountants." Correct. You said "the more affluent employ accountants" which is exactly the phrase that I quoted.
 
ubiquitous said:
Have you any evidence to back up this assertion? I don't believe it is correct. For example, previous AAM threads have discussed the current Revenue practice to sometimes indicate on PAYE Balancing Statements that minor PAYE balances owed to by the taxpayer "will not be collected at this time".
Click to expand...

I have had several such cases where the underpayment on the clients' PAYE Balancing Statements was under €200 and Revenue did not collect. One must assume it's not worth their while to code in & collect such amounts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top